Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

X-ray induced mutations, DNA and target theory

Abstract

THAT X-ray induced, specific locus, germ-line mutation rates vary significantly in eukaryotes is generally known, but the factors that are responsible for such differences have not been assessed in detail. It was recently proposed1 for a variety of species that mutability is closely and simply related to total DNA per genome. This approach, however, has not stood the test of critical review2; in fact, even within one species (mouse) there are major differences between the rates for different genes, and even for different germ cells3–5. I have therefore taken a different approach by considering the radiobiology of the individual gene. The analysis leads to three major conclusions. (1) Mutation rates tend to be much lower than radiation theory predicts. (2) Selection and/or repair are major factors that determine the rates. (3) The mouse 7-locus test, which provides a principal data base for the standards of human radiation hygiene, may not provide adequate overall representation of the mutability of the mammalian genome, so more research is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahamson, S., Bender, M. A., Conger, A. D., and Wolff, S., Nature, 245, 460–461 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schalet, A. P., and Sankaranarayanan, K., Mutat. Res., 35, 341–370 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Russell, W. L., in Advances in Radiation Research Biology and Medicine (edit. by Duplan, J. F. and Chapiro, A.), 323–334 (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Russell, W. L., in Repair from Genetic Radiation Damage, (edit. by Sobels, F. H.), 205–217 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kohn, H. I., and Melvold, R. W., Nature, 259, 209–210 (1916).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lea, D. E., Actions of Radiations on Living Cells (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pollard, E. C., Guild, W. R., Hutchinson, F., and Setlow, R. B., Progress in Biophysics, 5 (edit. by Butler, J. A. V., and Randall, J. T.), 72–108 (Academic, New York, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hutchinson, F., Science, 134, 533–538 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dertinger, H., and Jung, H., Molecular Radiation Biology (Springer, New York, 1970).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Augustine, L. G., Brustad, T., and Mason, R., Adv. Radiat. Biol., 1 (edit. by Augenstein, L. G., Mason, R., and Quastler, H.) 227–266 (Academic, New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lyon, M. F., and Morris, T., Mutat. Res., 8, 191–198 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KOHN, H. X-ray induced mutations, DNA and target theory. Nature 263, 766–767 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/263766a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/263766a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing