Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Opposing effects of cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP on protein phosphorylation in tubulin preparations

An Erratum to this article was published on 23 September 1976

Abstract

CYCLIC AMP and cyclic GMP have been postulated to be in certain cases, antagonistic intracellular messengers of many hormones and neurotransmitters acting at the cell membrane1. At least part of their antagonism may be the result of their ability to affect, in opposite directions, specific protein kinases and phosphates which work on common substrates (enzymes, structural proteins). Cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP have been found to activate, and the former also to inhibit, specific protein kinases2–5; cyclic AMP can activate or inhibit5–8 specific protein phosphates, and both cyclic nucleotide-sensitive protein kinases and protein phosphates have been isolated forming a complex with their substrate5. Some of these effects of cyclic nucleotides, however, have been found to depend on the type and concentration (not necessarily physiological) of the ion used in the assay5 and no direct evidence exists to show that one of the cyclic nucleotides opposes the effects of the other on protein phosphorylation. We report here that physiological concentrations (10−7 M–10−9 M) of cyclic GMP oppose the cyclic AMP (10−6M) dependent phosphorylation of a soluble, perhaps tubulin-related brain protein, possibly by activation of a phosphoprotein phosphatase.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldberg, N. D., et al., Adv. Cyclic Nucleotide Res., 5, 307–330 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Krebs, E. G., Curr. Top. cell. Regul., 5, 99–133 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuo, J. F., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 4037–4041 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Casnellie, J. E., and Greengard, P., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 1891–1895 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ueda, T., Rudolph, S. A., and Greengard, P., Archs. Biochem. Biophys., 170, 492–503 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. DeLorenzo, R. J., and Greengard, P., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 1831–1835 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maeno, H., Ueda, T., and Greengard, P., J. Cyclic Nucleotide Res., 1, 37–48 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, F. L., and Glinsman, W. H., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 72, 3004–3008, (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandoval, I., and Cuatrecasas, P., Biochemistry (in the press).

  10. Goodman, D. B., Rasmussen, H., Di Bella, F., and Guthrow, C. E., Jr, Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 67, 652–659 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Soifer, D., J. Neurochem., 24, 21–33 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eipper, B. A., J. biol. Chem., 249, 1398–1406 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shigekawa, B. L., and Olsen, R. W., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 63, 455–462 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sloboda, R. D., Rudolph, S. A., Rosenbaum, J. L., and Greengard, P., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 72, 177–181 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Walsh, D. A., et al., J. biol. Chem., 246, 1977–1985 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gratecos, D., and Fischer, E. H., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 58, 960–967 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Siebert, G., Schönharting, M., Monika, O., and Surjana, S., Hoppe-Seyler's Z. physiol. Chem., 356, 855–860 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SANDOVAL, I., CUATRECASAS, P. Opposing effects of cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP on protein phosphorylation in tubulin preparations. Nature 262, 511–514 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/262511a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/262511a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing