Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Doubling potential of fibroblasts from different species after ionising radiation

Abstract

IT is well known that chicken fibroblasts invariably die after a certain number of doublings in vitro (cell senescence) and that they have never been established by any chemical or physical agent1. On the other hand, mouse fibroblasts invariably acquire spontaneously an infinite growth potential, and transformation can be induced at a high frequency by different oncogenes2. Other species like man also yield fibroblasts which never acquire spontaneously the capacity to divide for ever3 but can become permanent cell lines after infection with SV40 virus4. Transformation in human fibroblasts has only been unequivocally demonstrated after treatment with certain viruses. This behaviour of fibroblasts in vitro has been attributed to different nutritional requirements5. The two approaches to explain the phenomenon can be summarised as intrinsic properties against environmental conditions. We have previously shortened the life-spans of cultivated chicken fibroblasts with low dose rate ionising radiation6. We have carried out the same type of experiment with human and mouse fibroblasts and found that the response to ionising radiation fits the relative tendencies of these different fibroblasts to yield permanent cell lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pontén, J., Virol. Monogr., no. 8, 25 (Springer, New York, 1971).

  2. Earle, W. R., J. natn. Cancer Inst., 4, 165–212 (1943).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hayflick, L., and Moorhead, P. S., Expl Cell Res., 25, 585–621 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Girardi, A. J., Jensen, F. C., and Koprowski, H., J. cell. comp. Physiol., 65, 69–78 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore, G. E., and McLimans, W. F., J. theor. Biol., 20, 217–226 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lima, L., Malaise, E., and Macieira-Coelho, A., Expl Cell Res., 73, 345–350 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Todaro, G. J., and Green, H., J. Cell Biol., 17, 299–313 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Terzaghi, M., and Little, J. B., Nature, 253, 548–549 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dean, C. J., Feldschreiber, P., and Lett, J. T., Nature, 209, 49–52 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MACIEIRA-COELHO, A., DIATLOFF, C. & MALAISE, E. Doubling potential of fibroblasts from different species after ionising radiation. Nature 261, 586–588 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/261586a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/261586a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing