Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evidence for the proximity of sweet and bitter receptor sites

Abstract

ALTHOUGH sweetness and bitterness are generally referred to as two of the common or basic tastes, it is by no means certain that they are, in fact, primary1. Furthermore, neuro-physiological evidence has shown that response to several of the basic taste stimuli can occur in a single taste cell2. Much structural progress in the chemistry of sweetness has been made in the past decade through Shallenberger's hypothesis3–5 that the sweetness of sugars depends on hydrogen bonds between the sugar molecule and receptor site. Our previous work6–9 has indicated that sugar molecules and their simple derivatives are nearly always sweet, bitter or bitter–sweet. Bitter–sweet sugar molecules, like certain artificial sweeteners such as saccharin, have both bitterness and sweetness as intrinsic features of their molecules10—neither response can be altered by exhaustive stepwise purification of such compounds10. Bitter–sweet sugar molecules appear to be ‘polarised’ on taste receptors9 so that one end of the molecule binds to sweet receptor sites and the other to bitter receptor sites. It is not clear, however, whether these molecules distribute themselves, some on sweet receptors and some on bitter receptors, or whether a single molecule can span both sweet and bitter receptor sites simultaneously. We now report an experiment designed to distinguish between these possibilities, using a typical bitter–sweet and conformationally defined glycoside, methyl-α-D-mannopyranoside (Fig. 1.).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harper, R., Human Senses in Action (Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beidler, L. M., in Sweetness and Sweeteners (edit. by Birch, G. G., Green, L. F., and Coulson, C. B.), 84–85 (Applied Science, London, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shallenberger, R. S., J. Fd Sci., 29, 584–586 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shallenberger, R. S., and Acree, T. E., Nature, 216, 480–482 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shallenberger, R. S., and Acree, T. E., J. Agric. Fd. Chem., 17, 701–703 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Birch, G. G., and Lindley, M. G., J. Fd Sci., 38, 665–667 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Birch, G. G., and Lindley, M. G., J. Fd Sci., 38, 1197–1181 (1973).

  8. Birch, G. G., and Lee, C. K., in Sweetness and Sweetners (edit. by Birch, G. G., Green, L. F., and Coulson, C. B.), 95–111 (Applied Science, London, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Birch, G. G., Lee, C. K., and Lindley, M. G., Die Staerke, 27, 51–56 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rader, C. P., Tihanyi, S. G., and Zienty, F. B., J. Fd Sci., 32, 357–359 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schutz, H. G., and Pilgrim, F. J., J. exp. Psychol., 54, 41–48 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Birch, G. G., Cowell, N. D., and Young, F. H., J. Sci. Fd. Agric., 23, 1207–1212 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Birch, G. G., and Lee, C. K., J. Fd Sci., 39, 947–949 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Birch, G. G., Lee, C. K., and Rolfe, E. J. R., J. Sci. Fd Agric., 21, 650–653 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, C. K., and Birch, G. G., J. Fd Sci., 40, 784–787 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogawa, H., Sato, M., and Tamashita, S., J. Physiol., Lond., 199, 223–240 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Frank, M., and Pfaffmann, C., in Olfaction and Taste, 3 (edit. by Pfaffmann, C.), 488–491 (Rockefeller University Press, New York City, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BIRCH, G., MYLVAGANAM, A. Evidence for the proximity of sweet and bitter receptor sites. Nature 260, 632–634 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/260632a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/260632a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing