Correction to: Leukemia (2003) 17, 1324–1332. doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2402974
The authors would like to remark that, due to editorial changes in the above article, some references were accidentally switched. References 13, 14 and 15 were not correctly assigned. The correct order of the last three references appears below. The authors apologize for any confusion this error may have caused the readers.
References
De Haas V, Kaspers GJ, Oosten L, Bresters D, Pieters R, Van Der Velden VH et al. Is there a relationship between in vitro drug resistance and level of minimal residual disease as detected by polymerase chain reaction at the end of induction therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia? Br J Haematol 2002; 4: 1190–1191.
Szczepanski T, Willemse MJ, Brinkhof B, van Wering ER, van der Burg M, van Dongen JJ . Comparative analysis of Ig and TCR gene rearrangements at diagnosis and at relapse of childhood precursor-B-ALL provides improved strategies for selection of stable PCR targets for monitoring of minimal residual disease. Blood 2002; 7: 2315–2323.
Yeoh EJ, Ross ME, Shurtleff SA, Williams WK, Patel D, Mahfouz R et al. Classification, subtype discovery, and prediction of outcome in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia by gene expression profiling. Cancer Cell 2002; 1: 133–143.
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/sj.leu.2402974
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Staal, F., van der Burg, M., Wessels, L. et al. Erratum: DNA microarrays for comparison of gene expression profiles between diagnosis and relapse in precursor-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia: choice of technique and purification influence the identification of potential diagnostic markers. Leukemia 18, 1041 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403373
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403373
