Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Manuscript
  • Published:

Adult ALL

Risk assessment in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia before early haemopoietic stem cell transplantation with a geno-identical donor: an easy clinical prognostic score to identify patients who benefit most from allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation

Abstract

In 1402 patients allografted in Europe during the period 1990–2000 with an HLA-identical sibling in first remission (CR1), the median interval from CR1 to allotransplant (96 days) was a major prognostic factor, patients transplanted earlier having a worse outcome. We studied in depth the 414 fully evaluable patients transplanted less than 96 days after achieving CR1; in these patients, only three factors predicted for the outcome by multivariate analysis: patient age, CR1 achievement with one or more induction courses and the recipient/donor sex combination. These three factors overcame the information from cytogenetics and source of stem cells. Three prognostic groups could be identified in relation to the outcome, using a prognostic score affecting 1 to each poor risk factor (total from 0 to 3): Group 1 (good prognosis) includes patients <35 years old, achieving CR1 with one induction course and to be transplanted with any other sex combination than female to male (score 0); group 2 (intermediate) with one adverse factor (score 1); and group 3 (bad prognosis) with two or three adverse criteria (scores 2 and 3). In these three groups, the 3-year leukaemia-free survival was 56±5%, 48±4% and 29±4% and the overall survival was 65±5, 53±4 and 29±5%, respectively. Therefore, adult patients with ALL and a score of 0 or 1 are good candidates for an early transplant if they have an identical sibling donor. Patient age, response to induction and the sex of the HLA-identical family donor (if existing) are the strongest easy predictors of the outcome for an early transplant in an adult patient with ALL. No additional information is mandatory.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin T, Gajewski J . Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute lymphocytic leukemia in adults. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 2001; 1: 97–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Flowers ME, Kansu E, Sullivan KM . Pathophysiology and treatment of graft-versus-host disease. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 1999; 13: 1091–1099.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan E, Meier P . Non parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cox D . Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 1972; 34: 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Campana D, Yokota S, Coustan-Smith E, Hansen-Hagge TE, Janossy G, Bartram CR . The detection of residual acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells with immunologic methods and polymerase chain reaction: a comparative study. Leukemia 1990; 4: 609–614.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Campana D, Coustan-Smith E . Detection of minimal residual disease in acute leukemia by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1999; 38: 139–152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen JS, Coustan-Smith E, Suzuki T, Neale GA, Mihara K, Pui CH et al. Identification of novel markers for monitoring minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2001; 97: 2115–2120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Coustan-Smith E, Sancho J, Hancock ML, Boyett JM, Behm FG, Raimondi SC et al. Clinical importance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2000; 96: 2691–2696.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoelzer D, Gokbuget N . Recent approaches in acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2000; 36: 49–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitterbauer G, Nemeth P, Wacha S, Cross NC, Schwarzinger I, Jaeger U . Quantification of minimal residual disease in patients with BCR-ABL- positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia using quantitative competitive polymerase chain reaction. Br J Haematol 1999; 106: 634–643.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Faderl S, Kantarjian M, Talpaz M, Estrov Z . Clinical significance of cytogenetic abnormalities in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 1998; 91: 3995–4019.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Labopin M, Porcher R, Bittencourt H, Rocha V, Katsahian S, Latouche A et al. Competing risk analysis for patients undergoing allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Bone marrow transplantation 2002; 29(Suppl. 2): 878a.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gratwohl A, Hermans J, Goldman JM, Arcese W, Carreras E, Devergie A et al. Risk assessment for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia before allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation. Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Lancet 1998; 352: 1087–1092.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stock VA . Management of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: moving toward a risk-adapted approach. Current Opin in Oncol 2001; 13: 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gorin NC, Labopin M, Laporte JP, Douay L, Lopez M, Lesage S et al. Importance of marrow dose on posttransplant outcome in acute leukemia: models derived from patients autografted with mafosfamide-purged marrow at a single institution. Exp Hematol 1999; 27: 1822–1830.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gorin NC . Autologous stem cell transplantation in acute lymphocytic leukemia. Stem Cells 2002; 20: 3–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Holowiecki J, Wojnar J, Krawczyk-Kulis M, Kruzel T, Markiewicz M, Kopera M et al. Allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation in single centre experience. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 22(Suppl 4) S100–S103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Powles R, Sirohi B, Treleaven J, Kulkarni S, Tait D, Singhal S et al. The role of posttransplantation maintenance chemotherapy in improving the outcome of autotransplantation in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2002; 100: 1641–1647.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin T, Linker C . Autologous stem cell transplantation for acute lymphocytic leukemia in adults. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 2001; 15: 121–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Snyder DS, Nademanee AP, O'Donnell MR, Parker PM, Stein AS, Margolin K et al. Long term follow up of 23 patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with allogeneic bone marrow transplant in first complete remission. Leukemia 1999; 13: 2053–2058.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

Supported in part by EBMT funds, Association Claude Bernard and Association pour la recherche sur le cancer (ARC).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorin, NC., Labopin, M., Polge, E. et al. Risk assessment in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia before early haemopoietic stem cell transplantation with a geno-identical donor: an easy clinical prognostic score to identify patients who benefit most from allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 17, 1596–1599 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403030

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links