Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

BHC Not Found to Reduce the Shell Quality of Hens' Eggs

Abstract

SEVERAL organochloride pesticides are said to have detrimental effects on the eggshell quality of a variety of avian species. The eggshell thickness of ducks is reduced by feeding dieldrin and DDE1,2; that of American kestrels by DDE3; of Japanese quail by DDT4 and of American sparrow hawks by a mixture of DDT and dieldrin5. Indeed, a mathematical relationship seems to exist between DDE residues and shell thinning6. Major structural defects, apart from shell thinning, have also been found to occur in the eggshells of quail fed DDT or chlordecone7. Now that the use of DDT has been, or is about to be, banned in many parts of the world, γ-BHC (lindane) is becoming the most widely used pesticide in this class. However, little is known about its effects on birds. Whitehead et al.8 found that feeding γ-BHC at moderate levels (about 100 mg/kg diet) to hens permanently reduced their egg production by 25%, although no detrimental effect was observed on shell thickness. In contrast, Sauter and Steele9 have claimed that feeding it to hens at a lower level, 10 mg/kg diet, slightly reduced shell thickness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lehner, P. N., and Egbert, A., Nature, 224, 1218 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Heath, R. G., Spann, J. W., and Kreitzer, J. F., Nature, 224, 47 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiemeyer, S. N., and Porter, R. D., Nature, 227, 737 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bitman, J., Cecil, H. C., Harris, S. J., and Fries, G. F., Nature, 224, 44 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Porter, R. D., and Wiemeyer, S. N., Science, 165, 199 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blus, L. J., Gish, C. D., Belisle, A. A., and Prouty, R. M., Nature, 235, 376 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McFarland, L. Z., Garrett, R. L., and Nowell, J. A., Proc. 4th A. Scanning Electron Microsc. Symp., 377 (1971).

  8. Whitehead, C. C., Downing, A. G., and Pettigrew, Rosemary J., Br. Poult. Sci., 13, 293 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sauter, E. A., and Steele, E. E., Poult. Sci, 51, 71 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carter, T. C., Br. Poult. Sci., 11, 433 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WHITEHEAD, C., DOWNIE, J. & PHILLIPS, J. BHC Not Found to Reduce the Shell Quality of Hens' Eggs. Nature 239, 411–412 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/239411a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/239411a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing