Abstract
IN his concern with re-delivering Kammerer's work, Koestler has assumed that if Kammerer's experimental integrity were accepted, his Lamarckian conclusions would be reasonable1, a flaw unnoticed by a recent review2. However, known phenomena are sufficient to explain Kammerer's results. Most controversy followed work on the terrestrial midwife toad, eggs from which were immersed in water for several generations. Most eggs died but eventually some male descendants were produced with nuptial pads, characteristic of aquatic anurans. Kammerer suggested acquired inheritance, but intensive selection had occurred and a third explanation is that an environmentally-triggered gene switch had operated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Koestler, A., The Case of the Midwife Toad (Hutchinson, London, 1971).
Werskey, P. G., Nature, 234, 489 (1971).
Hoar, W. S., General and Comparative Physiology (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1966).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ANGSEESING, J. Kammerer's Midwife. Nature 239, 408 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/239408a0
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/239408a0
This article is cited by
-
A Salamander Midwife
Nature (1973)
-
Kammerer's Midwife
Nature (1972)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.