Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Excess of Like Sexed Pairs of Dizygotic Twins

Nature volume 232, pages 277–278 (1971)Cite this article

Abstract

BEFORE recent developments with marker genes, it was not possible to assign with certainty the zygosity of a substantial proportion of twin pairs. So it was usual, when estimating the incidence of monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) pairs, to use Weinberg's differential rule1, which postulates that among DZ pairs the frequencies of same sex and of opposite sex pairs are almost exactly equal (the difference from equality being occasioned by an adjustment for the sex ratio). Although it is important to know whether this is true, as far as I know, it has never been adequately tested, though the suggestion has been made more than once that estimates (based on Weinberg's rule) of the frequency of MZ twins seem to be too high10,15. I have some suggestions to explain this disparity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinberg, W., Arch. Ges. Physiol., 88, 346 (1902).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Simmons, R. T., Graydon, J. J., Jacobowicz, R., and Doig, R. K., Med. J. Austral., ii, 246 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cameron, A. H., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 61, 229 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nylander, P. P. S., J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Commonwealth, 77, 506 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, S. M., and Penrose, L. S., Ann. Human Genet., 19, 273 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Potter, E. L., Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec., 87, 566 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Walsh, R. J., and Kooptzoff, O., Austral. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci., 33, 189 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Corney, G., Robson, E. B., and Strong, S. J., Ann. Human Genet., 32, 89 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nylander, P. P. S., J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Commonwealth, 76, 699 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nylander, P. P. S., and Corney, G., Ann. Human. Genet., 33, 31 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stevenson, A. C., Ann. Human Genet., 23, 415 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tricomi, V., Serr, D., and Solish, G., Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec., 79, 505 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carr, D. H., Obstet. Gynec., 26, 308 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barr, A., and Stevenson, C., Ann. Human Genet., 25, 131 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Renkonen, K. O., Ann. Human Genet., 30, 277 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cannings, C., Ann. Human Genet., 32, 403 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dahlberg, G., Twin Births and Twins from a Hereditary Point of View (Bokforlags—A.-B. Tidens Tryckeri, Stockholm, 1926).

    Google Scholar 

  18. James, W. H., Lancet, i, 112 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gallon Laboratory, University College London,

    W. H. JAMES

Authors
  1. W. H. JAMES
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

JAMES, W. Excess of Like Sexed Pairs of Dizygotic Twins. Nature 232, 277–278 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/232277a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/232277a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing