Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Dream Recall and the Bias of Intellectual Ability

Abstract

MANY people who gain high scores on conventional IQ tests are less successful on open ended tests that require mental fluency and imaginativeness1–4. Such individuals have been called convergers, and those with the opposite bias, divergers3; convergers are more likely to specialize in the physical sciences, divergers in the arts3,5. Open ended tests are themselves widely assumed to measure creativity, but the association with arts or science specialization suggests that this is an oversimplification.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Getzels, J. W., and Jackson, P. W., Creativity and Intelligence (Wiley, New York, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wallach, M. A., and Kogan, N., Modes of Thinking in Young Children (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hudson, L., Contrary Imaginations (Methuen, London, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cropley, A., and Maslany, G., Brit. J. Psychol., 60, 395 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Povey, R. M., Brit. J. Psychol., 61, 55 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rechtschaffen, A., and Verdone, P., Percep. Motor Skills, 19, 947 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aserinsky, E., and Kleitman, N., Science, 118, 273 (1953).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Molinari, S., and Foulkes, D., Percep. Motor Skills, 29, 343 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dement, W. C., in New Directions in Psychology II (edit. by Edwards, W., Lindmann, H., and Phillips, L.) (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hall, C., and Van de Castle, R. L., The Content Analysis of Dreams (Meredith, New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dement, W. C., and Wolpert, E. A., J. Exp. Psychol., 55, 543 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger, R. J., and Oswald, I., Science, 137, 601 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis, H. B., Goodenough, D. R., Shapiro, A., and Sleser, I., J. Abnorm. Psychol., 71, 52 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Antrobus, J. S., Dement, W. C., and Fisher, C., J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 69, 341 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hadamard, J., The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (Dover, New York, 1954).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Freud, S., The Interpretation of Dreams (Hogarth Press, London, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

AUSTIN, M. Dream Recall and the Bias of Intellectual Ability. Nature 231, 59–60 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/231059a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/231059a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing