Abstract
ANY plausible theory about the origin of the solar system must explain, among other known facts, the chemical fractionation of the planets. The terrestrial planets (of densities 3.9–5.5 g cm−3) are principally characterized by Fe, Mg, Si and oxygen, whereas some of the outer planets, of densities 0.7–1.6 g cm−3 and rich in hydrogen, helium and other volatiles, may have retained the elemental composition of the original solar nebula. Hoyle and Wickramasinghe1,2 have suggested that the planets were formed in a hot solar centrifuge3, and that whereas Jupiter and Saturn have the composition of the original solar nebula, the deficiency of hydrogen in Uranus and Neptune arises because the peripheral speed of hydrogen molecules is equal to the escape velocity from the solar system for these orbital distances. Further, the compositions of the more dense Fe-bearing inner planets may be caused essentially by thermal fractionation1–3, because refractory MgO, Fe and SiO2 of the principal elements and possible molecules condense first at ∼ 1500 K. The composition of Pluto is crucial to the validity of the nebular centrifuge theory, since from its position in the solar system the theory demands that Pluto not be Fe-rich. Here I show that similarities in the spectra of Pluto and Fe-bearing terrestrial silicates indicate that Pluto may well be Fe-rich.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hoyle, F., Quart. J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 1, 28 (1960).
Hoyle, F., and Wickramasinghe, N. C., Nature, 217, 415 (1968).
Stubbs, P., New Scientist, 47, 465 (1970).
Fix, J. D., Neff, J. S., and Kelsey, L. A., Astron. J., 75, 895 (1970).
Manning, P. G., Canad. Mineral., 9, 723 (1969).
Manning, P. G., Canad. Mineral., 10, 677 (1970).
Keester, K. L., and White, W. B., Proc. Fifth Intern. Mineral. Assoc. Meeting., 22 (Cambridge, 1966).
Adams, J. B., Science, 159, 1453 (1968).
Manning, P. G., Nature, 221, 1121 (1970).
Wood, D. L., and Remeika, J. P., J. Appl. Phys., 38, 1038 (1967).
Faye, G. H., and Hogarth, D. D., Canad. Mineral., 10, 25 (1969).
Manning, P. G., Nature, 228, 844 (1970).
Manning, P. G., Canad. J. Earth Sci., 4, 1039 (1967).
Manning, P. G., Canad. Mineral., 9, 237 (1967).
Kuiper, G. P., Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 62, 133 (1950).
Halliday, I., Hardie, R. H., Pranz, O. G., and Priser, J. B., Astron. J., 70, 676 (1965).
Halliday, I., Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific., 81, 285 (1969).
Kiladze, R., J. Brit. Astron. Soc., 78, 124 (1968).
Observers Handbook, Roy. Astron. Soc. Canad. (University of Toronto Press, 1971).
Science, 167, 449 (1970).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MANNING, P. Is Pluto an Iron-rich Planet?. Nature 230, 234–235 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/230234a0
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/230234a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.