Abstract
Two mutually antagonistic concentric regions, the centre and the surround, make up the receptive field of most cat retinal ganglion cells. It is believed that each region corresponds to a functional unit or response mechanism, the two overlapping spatially but each having its own receptor representation1–3. In response to square-wave stimuli of such geometry and luminance that both mechanisms are stimulated, the ganglion cell receives excitatory stimuli from one mechanism, and inhibitory ones from the other at the onset of light. At the offset of light the mechanisms reverse their roles. The mutual antagonism of the two mechanisms is manifested, but according to rules that are not well established. In spite of the overlap in distribution of centre and surround receptors, it has been possible to apply stimuli, the geometry and luminance of which are such that either a pure central or a pure surround response, without cross-contamination, is elicited4–6. (Response is here defined as a change in spike rate elicited by a change in stimulus luminance.) This, for the first time, makes it possible to explore directly the mode of antagonism between the two mechanisms. We present here results obtained from three on-centre cells which demonstrate unequivocally that the response of the ganglion cell to a combination of central and surround inputs is simply the algebraic sum of the pure responses to these same inputs delivered separately. The results strongly suggest that, up to the ganglion cell, there is indeed no interaction between the two mechanisms. The interpretation of experiments on retinal ganglion cells of the centre-surround type is thus greatly simplified.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kuffler, S., J. Neurophysiol., 16, 37 (1953).
Rodieck, R. W., and Stone, J., J. Neurophysiol., 28, 833 (1965).
Enroth-Cugell, C., and Robson, J. G., J. Physiol., 187, 517 (1966).
Stone, J., and Fabian, M., Vision Res., 8, 1023 (1968).
Cleland, B. G., and Enroth-Cugell, C., J. Physiol., 198, 17 (1968).
Pinto, L. H., Enroth-Cugell, C., and Gray, J. S., Fed. Proc., 28, 331 (1969).
Cleland, B., and Enroth-Cugell, C., Acta Physiol. Scand., 68, 365 (1966).
Cleland, B., and Enroth-Cugell, C., J. Physiol., 206, 73 (1970).
Buttner, U., and Grusser, O. J., Kybernetik, 4, 81 (1968).
Rodieck, R. W., Vision Res., 5, 583 (1965).
Maffei, L., and Cervetto, L., Vision Res., 8, 1299 (1968).
Alpern, M., Rushton, W. A. H., and Torii, S., Nature, 223, 1171 (1969).
Granit, R., Kernell, D., and Lamarre, Y., J. Physiol., 187, 379 (1966).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ENROTH-CUGELL, C., PINTO, L. Algebraic Summation of Centre and Surround Inputs to Retinal Ganglion Cells of the Cat. Nature 226, 458–459 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/226458a0
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/226458a0
This article is cited by
-
Receptive-field microstructure of blue-yellow ganglion cells in primate retina
Nature Neuroscience (1999)
-
A spatio-temporal model of cat's retinal cells
Biological Cybernetics (1978)
-
Human psychophysical analysis of receptive field-like properties: IV. Further examination and specification of the psychophysical transient-like function
Documenta Ophthalmologica (1976)
-
The effect of volatile anaesthetics on bacterial growth
Canadian Anaesthetists’ Society Journal (1973)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.