Abstract
I AM sorry that M. P. Melrose has misunderstood my article “Complementarity and Philosophy”1 as profoundly as is revealed by his note2. The relation between ordinary language and physical languages discussed in the article is not at all of the kind Melrose presents in the note. On this point I can do nothing better than advise Melrose to read my article again.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Bergstein, T., Nature, 222, 1033 (1969).
Melrose, M. P., Nature, 223, 874 (1969).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BERGSTEIN, T. Complementarity and Philosophy: A Reply to Criticism. Nature 224, 889 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/224889a0
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/224889a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.