Abstract
THERE have been several attempts to explain the large secular acceleration of the motion of Phobos (the closer of the two satellites of Mars) that was derived by Sharpless1 by fitting a quadratic expression for the mean longitude to five selected groups of orbital elements covering the period 1879 to 1941. An analysis2 of all suitable visual observations made during the period 1877–1929 failed, however, to confirm this secular acceleration. The orbital elements obtained in this analysis, taking the secular acceleration as zero, were subsequently3 shown to fit these visual observations and also positions obtained by Sharpless in 1941 and, photographically, by Kuiper in 1956 to within about ±2° in the value of the constant term in the linear expression for the mean longitude. This uncertainty is believed to be due partly to the errors of the observations and partly to the approximations in the orbital model used to fit the observations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Sharpless, B. P., Astron. J., 51, 185 (1945).
Wilkins, G. A., Proc. IAU Symp. No. 25, 271 (1966).
Wilkins, G. A., Mantles of the Earth and Terrestrial Planets (edit. by Runcorn, S. K.), 77 (1967).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WILKINS, G. Motion of Phobos. Nature 224, 789 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/224789a0
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/224789a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.