Abstract
X-RAY diffraction maxima from an ordered array of identical particles can arise either from the internal structure of each particle or from an interparticle repeat. If the Bragg spacing varies with the concentration of particles in the preparation, it is generally safe to assume that the spacing is an interparticle one. In the case of F-actin, previous workers1,2 who studied dried fibres by X-ray diffraction observed an equatorial reflexion with a spacing of 55 Å, which increased in spacing as the relative humidity was raised2. It was therefore concluded that this represented an interfilament repeat. It has also been deduced3 that the 120 Å equatorial reflexion from living molluscan smooth muscle arises from the side-by-side packing of actin filaments: this reflexion is obtained as well from vertebrate smooth muscle, and the spacing changes with the tonicity of the medium4,5. In view of these results it is puzzling that when Vazina et al.6 studied concentrated sols of F-actin the positions of their low-angle reflexions did not change with protein concentration; they concluded, in fact, that the diffraction maxima (at 230 and 110 Å) arose from the axial periodicity of the filaments rather than from an interfilament repeat.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astbury, W. T., and Spark, L. C., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1, 388 (1947).
Cohen, C., and Hanson, J., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 21, 177 (1956).
Lowy, J., and Vibert, P. J., Nature, 215, 1254 (1967).
Elliott, G. F., and Lowy, J., Nature, 219, 156 (1968).
Vibert, P. J., thesis, Univ. of London (1969).
Vazina, A., Frank, G., and Lemazhikhin, B., J. Mol. Biol., 14, 373 (1965).
Hanson, J., and Lowy, J., J. Mol. Biol., 6, 46 (1963).
Carsten, M. E., and Mommaerts, W. F. H. M., Biochemistry, 2, 28 (1963).
Rees, M. K., and Young, M., J. Biol. Chem., 242, 4449 (1967).
Gregory, J., and Holmes, K. C., J. Mol. Biol., 13, 796 (1965).
Tsuboi, K. S., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 160, 420 (1968).
Elliott, A., J. Sci. Instrum., 42, 312 (1965).
Guinier, A., and Fournet, G., in Small-angle Scattering of X-rays, 100 (Wiley, 1955).
Guinier, A., and Fournet, G., in Small-angle Scattering of X-rays, 51 (Wiley, 1955).
Guinier, A., and Fournet, G., in Small-angle Scattering of X-rays, 116 (Wiley, 1955).
Hanson, J., Quart. Rev. Biophys., 1, 177 (1968).
Bernal, J. D., and Fankuchen, I., J. Gen. Physiol., 25, 111 (1941).
Johnson, P., Harris, C. I., and Perry, S. V., Biochem. J., 105, 361 (1967).
Oster, G., and Riley, D. P., Acta Cryst., 5, 272 (1952).
Holmes, K. C., and Blow, D. M., in The Use of X-ray Diffraction in the Study of Protein and Nucleic Acid Structure, 209 (Interscience, 1965).
Elliott, G. F., J. Gen. Physiol., 50, 171 (1967).
Rome, E., J. Mol. Biol., 27, 591 (1967).
Elliott, G. F., J. Theoret. Biol., 20, 71 (1968).
Rome, E., J. Mol. Biol., 37, 331 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SPENCER, M. Low-angle X-ray Diffraction from Concentrated Sols of F-Actin. Nature 223, 1361–1362 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/2231361a0
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2231361a0
This article is cited by
-
Internal motions of actin characterized by quasielastic neutron scattering
European Biophysics Journal (2011)
-
Role of fimbrin and villin in determining the interfilament distances of actin bundles
Nature (1983)
-
A Type of Contraction Hypothesis applicable to all Muscles
Nature (1970)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.