Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Stimulation of Graft versus Host Splenomegaly by Thymectomy of the Donor

Abstract

THERE is little doubt that the thymus plays some part in potentiating and maintaining some kinds of specific immunological competence. Although the nature of this role is obscure, thymectomy clearly affects different immunological capabilities differentially. All the well known effects of thymectomy are expressed as inhibitions of immunological capability1,2. We wish to describe the inverse situation. Thymectomy removes an inhibition present in half the chickens tested for graft versus host reactions (GVHR) to non-B antigen (B is the major histoincompatibility locus of chickens). The inhibition of the GVHR is proportional to the life span of the donor; long lived birds are weak GVHR donors and short lived birds are strong GVHR donors3. Thymectomy of the donor eliminates the inhibition of the GVHR and shortens the life span. After testing several explanations we attribute the normal inhibition to competition by environmental antigen, a competition which may be nullified by thymectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller, J. F. A. P., and Osoba, D., Physiol. Rev., 47, 437 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Warner, N. L., Folia Biol., 13, 1 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sheridan, S., Law, G. R. J., and Ruth, R. F., Fed. Proc., 27, 506 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper, M. D., Peterson, R. D. A., South, M. A., and Good, R. A., J. Exp. Med., 123, 75 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bealmear, P. M., and Wilson, R., Cancer Res., 27, 358 (1967).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, J. F. A. P., Dukor, P., Grant, G., St., C. Sinclair, N. R., and Sacquet, E., Clin. Exp. Immunol., 2, 531 (1967).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Good, R. A., Varco, R. L., Aust, J. B., and Zak, S. J., Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 64, 882 (1957).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruth, R. F., Fed. Proc., 19, 579 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Purchase, H. G., Chubb, R. C., and Biggs, P. M., J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 40, 583 (1968).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Purchase, H. G., and Biggs, P. M., Res. Vet. Sci., 8, 440 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sheridan, S., thesis, Univ. Wisconsin (1967).

  12. Seto, F., Transplantation, 5, 1280 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruth, R. F., Hohn, O., and Law, G. R. J., Scand. J. Haematol., Series Haematol., 8, 29 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bliss, J. B., Transplantation, 3, 730 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lengerova, A., and Matousek, V., Folia Biol., 14, 1 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liacopoulos, P., Merchant, B., and Harrell, B. E., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med., 125, 958 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liacopoulos, P., Merchant, B., and Harrell, B. E., Transplantation, 5, 1423 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schooley, J. C., Kelly, L. S., Dobson, E. L., Finney, C. R., Havens, V. W., and Cantor, L. N., J. Reticuloend. Soc., 2, 396 (1965).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. DiLuzio, N. R., J. Reticuloend. Soc., 4, 459 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  20. DiLuzio, N. R., J. Reticuloend. Soc., 5, 368 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. DeLanney, L. F., and Ebert, J. D., Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ., 621, Contrib. Embryol., 37, 57 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SHERIDAN, S., LAW, G. & RUTH, R. Stimulation of Graft versus Host Splenomegaly by Thymectomy of the Donor. Nature 221, 677–679 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/221677a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/221677a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing