Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Reversible Effect of Actinomycin D on Nucleoli of Amoeba discoides : Nuclear Transplantation Study

Abstract

ACTINOMYCIN D (AM) suppresses DNA-directed RNA synthesis in vivo1. Because the nucleolus is believed to be the site of ribosomal RNA synthesis2,3, the effect of AM on this organelle is of particular interest and has been the subject of many studies4–7. It has been reported that both the morphological and physiological effects of AM can, in certain circumstances, be reversed8,9. In view of the extensive use of AM in cancer chemotherapy as well as in cellular metabolic studies, it is important to establish whether cell constituents such as the nucleolus can recover their normal function after temporary exposure to concentrations of AM known to be lethal to the intact cell. This question can only be answered by transplanting the nucleoli treated with drugs to normal cytoplasm—a procedure most easily accomplished in the large, free-living amoebae by nuclear transplantation. The object of this work is to determine to what extent the effect of lethal concentrations of AM on the amoeba nucleoli can be reversed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reich, E., Cancer Res., 23, 1428 (1963).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Perry, R. P., Exp. Cell Res., 29, 400 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Caspersson, T., Farber, S., Foley, G. E., and Killander, D., Exp. Cell Res., 32, 529 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stevens, B. J., J. Ultrastruct. Res., 11, 329 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Simard, R., J. Cell Biol., 35, 716 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flickinger, C. J., J. Ultrastruct. Res., 23, 260 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoefl, G. I., J. Ultrastruct. Res., 10, 224 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mittermayer, C., Braun, R., and Rusch, H. P., Exp. Cell Res., 38, 33 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bal, A. K., and Gross, P. R., Science, 139, 584 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prescott, D. M., and James, T. W., Exp. Cell Res., 8, 256 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeon, K. W., Life Sci., 4, 1839 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeon, K. W., and Lorch, I. J., Nature, 217, 463 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Prescott, D. M., Rao, M. V. N., Evenson, D. P., Stone, G. E., and Thrasher, J. D., in Methods in Cell Physiology (edit. by Prescott, D. M.), 2, 131 (Academic Press, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prescott, D. M., in Methods in Cell Physiology (edit. by Prescott, D. M.), 1, 365 (Academic Press, New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goldstein, L., in The Use of Radioautography in Investigating Protein Synthesis (edit. by Lebnold, C. P., and Warren, K. B.), 79 (Academic Press, New York, 1965).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Reich, E., Franklin, R. M., Shatkin, A. J., and Tatum, E. L., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 48, 1238 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamann, W., Oehlert, W., and Hedderich, M., Virchows Arch., Abt. B, 1, 120 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ord, M. J., Quart. J. Micros. Sci., 97, 39 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LORCH, I., JEON, K. Reversible Effect of Actinomycin D on Nucleoli of Amoeba discoides : Nuclear Transplantation Study. Nature 221, 1073–1074 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/2211073a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2211073a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing