Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Phycoerythrins from some Acrochaetium Species

Abstract

THE possibility that the water soluble phycobilin pigments of red algae show physical properties of taxonomic significance at the generic level has been frequently explored. The three main phycoerythrin “types” described are C, B and R-phycoerythrin, based on their plant sources (from the Cyanophyceae, and from the sub-classes Bangiophycidae and Florideophycidae (Rhodophyceae) respectively), and on their absorption spectra. These “types” have been further described as “single”, “two” and “three peak” phycoerythrins, with peaks at 550 mµ, 565 and 550 mµ, and 565, 540 and 496 mµ, respectively1. It has also been shown in a recent review that the taxonomic implications are not entirely reliable2. Thus, in the genus Rhodochorton (order Nemalionales, Florideophycidae), R-phycoerythrin was obtained from R. purpureum (Lightf.) Rosenv. (= R. rothii)3, and B-phycoerythrin from R. floridulum (Dillw.) Nag.4. In a recent survey of the phycoerythrins from forty-four species of red algae from Japan, three “types” were again described, a “single peak” phycoerythrin from Compsopogon oishii (Bangiphycidae), with λmax at 565 mµ and a “shoulder” at 542 mµ; “two peak” phycoerythrin (peaks at 565 and 495 mµ, with a “shoulder” at 545 mµ) from Bangia and Porphyra (Bangiophycidae) and from Batrachospermum, Chantransia (= Acrochaetium) and Sirodotia (order Nemalionales, Florideophycidae); and “three peak” phycoerythrin (with peaks at 560–570 mµ, 535–545 mµ and 490–500 mµ) extracted from numerous representatives of the Florideophycidae5. It seems likely that the pigment “types” described from Japan represent different interpretations of the positions of maxima on the absorption spectra, and such differences can result from both the physiological conditions of the plants and the modes of pigment extraction2. Thus the “two peak” phycoerythrin described from Japan was considered to be a form of R-phycoerythrin, and similar to that described for Porphyra from a number of other sources6–10. It was also suggested, however, that these three pigment “types” might prove of taxonomic significance, with the “single peak” phycoerythrin being typical of primitive red algae, then the plants possessing the “two peaks and shoulder” phycoerythrin being next in order of advance, and the “three peak” phycoerythrin being characteristic of advanced genera.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blinks, L. R., Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 5, 93 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. O'heocha, C., Physiology and Biochemistry of Algae (edit. by Lewin, R. A.), 421 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  3. O'heocha, C., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 73, 207 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O'heocha, C., and O'carra, P., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 83, 1091 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirose, H., and Kumano, S., Bot. Mag., Tokyo, 79, 105 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kitasato, Z., Acta Phytochim., 2, 274 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Svedberg, T., and Katsurai, T., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 51, 3573 (1929).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujiwara, T., J. Biochem., 42, 411 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Haxo, F. T., and Blinks, L. R., J. Gen. Physiol., 33, 389 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Haxo, F. T., and Fork, D. C., Nature, 184, 1051 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. White, E. B., and Boney, A. D., Brit. Phycol. Bull., 3, 343 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stoloff, L., and Silva, P., Econ. Bot., 11, 327 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stoloff, L., Econ. Bot., 16, 86 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Augier, J., Rev. Gen. Bot., 60, 257 (1953).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O'heocha, C., Colloq. Intern. Centre Nat. Rech. Sc., 103, 121 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boney, A. D., Brit. Phycol. Bull., 3, 317 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dixon, P. S., Oceanog. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev., 1, 177 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Umezaki, I., Rev. Algol. NS, 9, 19 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BONEY, A., WHITE, E. Phycoerythrins from some Acrochaetium Species. Nature 218, 1068–1069 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/2181068a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2181068a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing