This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Dingle, H., Nature, 195, 985 (1962).
Born, M., Nature, 197, 1287 (1963).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MCCREA, W. Why the Special Theory of Relativity is Correct. Nature 216, 122–124 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/216122a0
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/216122a0
This article is cited by
-
Assessing GPT-4’s role as a co-collaborator in scientific research: a case study analyzing Einstein’s special theory of relativity
Discover Artificial Intelligence (2023)
-
In Defence of Dingle's Opponents
Nature (1973)
-
Invariant simultaneity
Czechoslovak Journal of Physics (1972)
-
Is the Special Theory of Relativity Wrong ?: The Underlying Physics of the Lorentz Transformation
Nature (1968)
-
Is the Special Theory Right or Wrong?: Experimental Verifications of the Theory of Relativity
Nature (1968)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.