Abstract
Middelhoek and Wild1 have recently measured mobilities for domain wall motion in double nickel–iron alloy which are significantly greater than those reported earlier by Patton and Humphrey2 for similar films. Both groups have published mobility data for single layer films which are in good agreement3,4. In an attempt to clarify the situation concerning double films, mobility measurements have been made for two of Middelhoek and Wild's double films, each with two 400 Å nickel–iron layers (80 per cent nickel) separated by 100 Å of silica, using the technique reported previously2,4. For these films, a wall mobility value of 1.2 (±0.3) × 104 cm/sec-Oe was obtained. Middelhoek and Wild's mobility of 4.1 × 104 cm/sec-Oe for double films (440 Å nickel–iron layers separated by 100 Å of silica) is significantly larger than the present determination. These differences are too large to be explained by the 40 Å difference in nickel–iron layer thickness or the scatter in the data. The differences in mobility determination for similar films from the same laboratory, as measured by different laboratories, can only be due to differences in the experimental technique.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Middelhoek, S., and Wild, D., Nature, 211, 1169 (1966).
Patton, C. E., and Humphrey, F. B., J. App. Phys., 37, 1270 (1966).
Middelhoek, S., I.B.M. J. Res. Devel., 10, 351 (1966).
Patton, C. E., and Humphrey, F. B., J. App. Phys., 37, 4269 (1966).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PATTON, C., HUMPHREY, F. Domain Wall Motion in Double Nickel–Iron Films. Nature 213, 1010–1011 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/2131010a0
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2131010a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.