Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Comparison of Relative Radionuclide Ratios in Debris from the Third and the Fifth Chinese Nuclear Test Explosions

Abstract

OF the five first Chinese nuclear test explosions, No. 3 and No. 5 detonated on May 9, 1966, and December 28, 1966, respectively, have been the most powerful. According to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission1 both explosions were in the lower end of the intermediate range, that is, they corresponded to a few hundred kilotons of TNT.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United States Atomic Energy Commission: Note to Editors and Correspondents, May 20, 1966, and December 28 1966.

  2. Sever, Y., and Lippert, J., Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 33, 347 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lippert, J., Some Applications for Semiconductor Detectors in Health Physics (in the press).

  4. Edvarson, K., Löw, K., and Sisefsky, J., Nature, 184, 1771 (1959).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Freiling, E. C., and Kay, M. A., Nature, 209, 236 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

AARKROG, A., LIPPERT, J. Comparison of Relative Radionuclide Ratios in Debris from the Third and the Fifth Chinese Nuclear Test Explosions. Nature 213, 1001–1002 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/2131001a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2131001a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing