Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Response to X-irradiation of a Tumour recurring after a TCD95 Radiation Dose

Abstract

CHINESE hamster cells which survived 1,500 rads (a survival fraction of ≈2 × 10−3) were found to have several heritable altered biological properties. These included a slower cell population doubling time, a smaller cell size, an abnormal chromosome number and morphology, and an increased radio-sensitivity—namely a D0 value of ≈135 rads instead of the 205 rads for the unirradiated or control cell line. Furthermore, these characteristics persisted in a number of the sub-lines for many months of continuous culture1. That changes of this type should occur in cells of tissue irradiated in vivo is plausible, and if they do occur such alterations would have important implications for tumour radiobiology and for clinical radiotherapy. This report describes an initial experiment that was designed to test for such an effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sinclair, W. K., Radiat. Res., 21, 584 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Suit, H. D., Shalek, R. J., and Wette, R., Cell. Radiat. Biol., 514 (1964).

  3. Nunnally, J., Worsnop, R., and Shalek, R. J., Cell. Radiat. Biol., 531 (1964).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SUIT, H. Response to X-irradiation of a Tumour recurring after a TCD95 Radiation Dose. Nature 211, 996–997 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/211996a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/211996a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing