Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Adjuvant Principle of Pertussis Vaccine in the Mouse

Abstract

IT is well known that the vaccines of many Gram-negative bacteria greatly enhance the antibody response to unrelated antigens administered to animals at about the same time, or as combined immunizing agents. The most familiar example is the increased potency of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids when combined with pertussis vaccine. Many investigators have attributed this heightened response to the heat-stable lipopolysaccharide endotoxins of this class of bacteria. Farthing1 tested the effect of heating pertussis vaccine for 1 h at 100° C on its ability to enhance antibody response to diphtheria toxoid in guinea-pigs. He found no effect which he could ascribe to heat, and went on to show that extracted endotoxin was responsible for the increase in antibody titre.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Farthing, J. R., Brit. J. Exp. Path., 42, 614 (1961).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pittman, M., Fed. Proc., 16, 867 (1957). Kind, L. S., Bacteriol. Rev., 22, 173 (1958). Munoz, J., in Bacterial Endotoxins, edit. by Landy, M., and Braun, W., 460 (Rutgers University Press, New Jersey, 1964). Levine, S., and Wenk, E. J., Science, 146, 1681 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kind, L. S., J. Immunol., 77, 115 (1956). Levine, S., Wenk, E. J., and Iovine, L., Fed. Proc., 24, 242 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ipsen, J., Biometrics, 2, 465 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pieroni, R. E., Broderick, E. J., and Levine, L., J. Immunol., 95, 643 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pieroni, R. E., and Levine, L. (in preparation). Bergman, R. K., and Munoz, J., J. Immunol., 95, 1 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Munoz, J., J. Immunol., 90, 132 (1963). Malkiel, S., and Hargis, B. J., Intern. Arch. Allergy, 26, 319 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morse, S. I., J. Exp. Med., 121, 49 (1965).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fishel, C. W., Szentivanyi, A., and Talmage, D. W., J. Immunol., 89, 8 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenblatt, E., and Johnson, A. G., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med., 113, 156 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stronk, M. G., and Pittman, M. J., J. Infect. Dis., 96, 152 (1955). Maitland, H. B., Kohn, R., and MacDonald, A. D., J. Hygiene, 53, 196 (1955)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, A. G., Gaines, S., and Landy, M., J. Expt. Med., 103, 225 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PIERONI, R., LEVINE, L. Adjuvant Principle of Pertussis Vaccine in the Mouse. Nature 211, 1419–1420 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/2111419a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2111419a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing