Abstract
THE concept of the relative biological efficiency of different radiations is one that has considerable practical and theoretical interest, and an extensive literature exists which describes in detail the problems of the determination and interpretation of relative biological efficiencies1. Variations in the relative biological efficiency of different radiations are attributable to differences in their ion density or linear energy transfer, defined as the rate of energy loss in eV/μ of irradiated material. Recently an opportunity arose at this laboratory to determine the relative biological efficiency of a highly energetic radiation with low linear energy transfer characteristics—an almost pure beam of μ- mesons. These have a mass of about 200me, one negative charge, and an energy range in this experiment of 2–8 GeV (with a peak at 4–6 GeV).
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zirkle, R. E., in Radiation Biology, edit. by Hollaender, A., 1 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1954).
Yamanauchi, T., and Marshall, L. (unpublished report).
Conger, A. D., and Giles, N. H., Genetics, 35, 397 (1950).
Sparrow, A. H., Cuany, R. L., Miksche, J. P., and Schairer, L. A., Rad. Bot., 1, 10 (1961).
Davies, D. R., Rad. Res. (in the press).
Schulman, J. H., and Etzel, H. W., Science, 118, 184 (1953).
Cameron, J. R., Daniels, F., Johnson, N., and Kenney, G., Science, 134, 333 (1961).
Rossi, H. H., and Failla, G., Nucleonics, 14, 32 (1956).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DAVIES, D., SPARROW, A., WOODLEY, R. et al. Relative Biological Efficiency of Negative μ-Mesons and Cobalt-60 γ-Rays. Nature 200, 277–278 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/200277a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/200277a0
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
