Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Interpretation of Quantum Physics

Abstract

THERE are undoubted difficulties in the interpretation of quantum physics, and Prof. A. Landé1 has made a determined effort to circumvent them in a straightforward and ‘common-sense’ way. He says: “Actually, an electron always behaves exactly as a particle ought to behave. It is a myth that it sometimes misbehaves”2. Irreducibly statistical relationships are central to Prof. Landé's treatment, and the appropriate recognition of their central importance is for him the special feature of quantum theory. But matter (unlike light) for him consists of “genuine particles”, and neither matter nor light has a genuine wave-particle schizophrenia. This is what he means by unity in his quantum physics, and his purpose is to re-frame quantum physics on this basis. It is the purpose of this communication to question his success. In addition to providing a new version of the content of quantum physics, Prof. Landé also offers a new derivation of it, which is based on “non-quantal” principles. This communication is not concerned with the derivation; however, if the present remarks concerning the body of the theory as presented are well founded, then it cannot be the case both that Prof. Landé's premises are valid, and that they lead validly to his version of quantum physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Landé, A., From Dualism to Unity in Quantum Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1960).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Op. cit., p. xi.

  3. “And here it must be emphasised that position in space-time defines a ‘state’.” Op. cit., p. 29. See also p. 67 where he interprets Heisenberg as demonstrating only a spread in the observations “of more exactly determined px-values”

  4. Duane, W., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 9, 158 (1923).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Landé, A., Op. cit., p. 69; italics in original. See also p. xii and p. 70.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

STOPES-ROE, H. Interpretation of Quantum Physics. Nature 193, 1276–1277 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/1931276a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1931276a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing