Abstract
IT is true that in the cell nucleus one finds substances in addition to DNA, and that these may play an important part in certain staining procedures. If, however, a dye known to be basic stains a structure known to contain DNA and known not to contain significant quantities of other acid (basophilic) substances, it is reasonable to regard DNA as the substrate primarily responsible for such staining. The same argument applies to nucleoli and pancreatic cytoplasmic chromidial substance, the basophilia of which is known to be due to RNA. This is very far from claiming chemical specificity for staining by a single basic dye or by a binary mixture; and, contrary to the impression apparently gained by Dr. van Duijn, no such claim was made. All these methods, including methyl green/pyronin, stain mast cell granules, cartilage matrix, mucin and other acidic substances in addition to nucleic acids, and one therefore cannot claim that an unknown substrate stained by any of these methods is nucleic acid (either DNA or RNA) unless one uses such additional procedures as the enzymatic digestions mentioned by Dr. Van Duijn.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GOLDSTEIN, D. Differential Staining of Nucleic Acids?. Nature 193, 1000–1001 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/1931000a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1931000a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.