Abstract
PROF. CULLWICK has directed attention to an incorrect statement, which I regret, in my review of the first edition of his book Electromagnetism and Relativity. As he says, the fundamental relation derived from his hypothesis (equation (1) of his communication) differs in sign from that usually adopted in the theory of superconductors so that Prof. Cullwick's hypothesis cannot be identified with the former—contrary to my statement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
FERRARO, V. Magnetic Energy. Nature 189, 566 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1038/189566a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/189566a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.