Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Murine Models

Leukaemogenic potency of WEHI-3B cells grown in vitro or in leukaemic mice

Abstract

In order to quantify contaminating leukaemia inducing cells in blood or bone marrow from WEHI-3B bearing BALB/c mice (injected with 105 WEHI-3B suspension culture cells), in vitro colony forming leukaemia cells (CFU-L) and survival rate and/or survival time of mice transplanted with cells from WEHI bearing mice or suspension culture were correlated. ED50 (inoculum inducing leukaemia in 50% of the animals) was 109 CFU-L (33–361) from suspension culture cells. Three weeks after initiation of leukaemia 2 × 105 BM or 0.5–2.0 × 106 blood cells induced 100% mortality of recipients. After mobilisation with CY or CY and G-CSF, the same amount of blood or BM cells did not induce leukaemia in recipients. A significant negative correlation was found between the survival time of leukaemic mice and the log number of CFU-L inoculated from in vivosources. In terms of CFU-L cells, leukaemia induction to BM or WBC obtained 3 weeks after leukaemia induction were more potent; those from BM or WBC also obtained at 3 weeks but after mobilisation were less potent inducers than those from suspension culture. These data suggest that CFU-L and leukaemogenic cells are associated, but not identical. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2001) 28, 699–704.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gratwohl A, Passweg J, Baldomero H, Hermans J . Blood and marrow transplantation activity in Europe 1996 Bone Marrow Transplant 1998 22: 227–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kessinger A, Sharp JG . Mobilization of blood stem cells Stem Cells 1998 16 (Suppl. 1): 139–143

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shadduck RK, Zeigler ZR, Andrews FD et al. Mobilization and transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells Stem Cells 1998 16 (Suppl. 1): 145–158

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fehér I, Gidáli J . Self-renewal capacity of mobilized murine haemopoietic stem cells Haematologia 1987 20: 15–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Molineux G, Pojda Z, Hampson IN et al. Transplantation potential of peripheral blood stem cells induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor Blood 1990 76: 2153–2158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Neben S, Marcus K, Mauch P . Mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell subpopulations from the marrow to the blood of mice following cyclophosphamide and/or granulocyte colony stimulating factor Blood 1993 81: 1960–1967

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weaver A, Ryder D, Crowther D et al. Increased number of long-term culture-initiating cells in the apheresis product of patients randomized to receive increasing doses of stem cell factor administered in combination with chemotherapy and a standard dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor Blood 1996 88: 3323–3328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pettengell R, Luft T, Henschler R et al. Direct comparison by limiting dilution analysis of long-term culture-initiating cells in human bone marrow, umbilical cord blood and blood stem cells Blood 1994 84: 3653–3359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brugger W, Bross KJ, Glatt M et al. Mobilization of tumor cells and hematopoietic progenitor cells into peripheral blood of patients with solid tumors Blood 1994 83: 636–640

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharp JG, Kessinger A, Vaughan WP et al. Detection and clinical significance of minimal tumor cell contamination of peripheral stem cell harvest Int J Cell Clon 1992 10: 92–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shpall EJ, Jones RB . Release of tumor cells from bone marrow Blood 1994 83: 623–625

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Franklin WA, Glaspy J, Pflaumer SM et al. Incidence of tumor cell contamination in leukapheresis products of breast cancer patients mobilized with stem cell factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or with G-CSF alone Blood 1999 94: 340–347

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rill DR, Santana VM, Roberts W et al. Direct demonstration that autologous bone marrow transplantation for solid tumors can return a multiplicity of tumorigenic cells Blood 1994 84: 380–383

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsukamoto AS, Reading C, Carella, A et al. Biological characterization of stem cell present in mobilized peripheral blood of CML patients Bone Marrow Transplant 1994 14 (Suppl. 3): S25–S32

    Google Scholar 

  15. Petzer AL, Eaves CJ, Lansdorp PM et al. Characterization of primitive subpopulations of normal and leukemic cells present in the blood of patients with newly diagnosed as well as established chronic myeloid leukemia Blood 1996 88: 2162–2171

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Deisseroth AB, Zu Z, Claxton D et al. Genetic marking shows that Ph+ cells present in autologous transplants of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) contribute to relapse after autologous bone marrow in CML Blood 1994 83: 3068–3076

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gidáli J, Fehér I . Lymphoma cell contamination of PBSC: a murine model Bone Marrow Transplant 1999 24: 617–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia-Castro J, Segovia JC, Bueren JA . Transplantation of syngenic bone marrow contaminated with NGFr-marked WEHI-3B cells: an improved model of leukemia relapse in mice Leukemia 2000 14: 457–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Metcalf D, Moore MAS, Warner NL . Colony formation in vitro by myelomonocytic leukemic cells J Natl Cancer Inst 1969 43: 983–1001

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Litchfield JT, Wilcoxon F . A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1949 96: 99–113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bertolini F, Battaglia M, Lanza A et al. Multilineage long term engraftment potential of drug resistant hematopoietic progenitors Blood 1997 90: 3027–3036

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Van der Berg D, Wessman M, Murray L et al. Leukemic burden in subpopulations of CD34+ cells isolated from the mobilized peripheral blood of interferon resistant or intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia Blood 1996 87: 4348–4357

    Google Scholar 

  23. Glimm H, Oh IH, Eaves CJ . Human hematopoietic stem cells stimulated to proliferate in vivo lose engraftment potential during their S/G2/M transit and do not reenter G0 Blood 2000 96: 4185–4193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gordon MY, Dowding C, Riley G et al. Altered adhesive interactions with marrow stroma of hematopoietic progenitor cells in chronic myeloid leukaemia Nature 1987 328: 342–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to express our thanks to Ms M Renner and Ms O Ullrich for their skilful technical assistance. This work was partly supported by grants 094/2000 and 508/2000 (Hungarian Ministry of Health) and T 026441 (Hungarian Academy of Sciences).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gidáli, J., Fehér, I., Megyeri, A. et al. Leukaemogenic potency of WEHI-3B cells grown in vitro or in leukaemic mice. Bone Marrow Transplant 28, 699–704 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703210

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703210

Keywords

Search

Quick links