Abstract
SINCE the publication by Lea and Coulson1 of the expected distributions of numbers of bacterial mutants in replicate cultures, there has been only one limited attempt to compare this theory with experimental observations. Armitage2 has shown that Lea and Coulson's unmodified theory will not allow a description of the pattern of mutants in Escherichia coli resistant3,4 to phage T1. In the literature a number of other examples are available for comparison. Experiments on mutation to resistance to ultra-violet radiation5 and to histidine independence6 in E. coli can be shown to give distributions of mutants which, like those to phage resistance, do not agree with the distributions predicted by Lea and Coulson. On the other hand, mutations to penicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus7, to tryptophane independence in Eberthella typhosa8, and to streptomycin resistance in E. coli9, give distributions fitting the theoretical one.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lea and Coulson, J. Genetics, 49, 264 (1949).
Armitage, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. (in the press).
Luria and Delbrück, Genetics, 28, 491 (1943).
Newcombe, Genetics, 33, 447 (1948).
Witkin, Genetics, 32, 221 (1947).
Ryan, Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 34, 425 (1948).
Demerec, Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 31, 16 (1945).
Curcho, J. Bact., 56, 374 (1948).
Scott, Brit. J. Exp. Path., 30, 501 (1949).
Ryan, J. Gen. Microbiol. (in the press).
Lederberg, Genetics, 33, 617 (1948).
Novick and Szilard, Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 36, 708 (1950).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RYAN, F. Distribution of Numbers of Mutant Bacteria in Replicate Cultures. Nature 169, 882–883 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1038/169882b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/169882b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.