Abstract
IN a letter under this title, Prof. C. H. Waddington1 has described an interesting selection experiment with a Drosophila phenocopy of ‘crossveinless’. He has demonstrated clearly that the phenocopic effect, at any rate in this case, depends on individual genetic constitution as well as on the shock treatment applied to the pupæ—a fact realized by Goldschmidt2 for phenocopies in general, but not followed up as Prof. Waddington has done. Analogous results have been obtained in this laboratory using the mutant ‘antennaless’3. Stocks homozygous for this gene show variable penetrance and expressivity on ordinary culture media. Selection and/or close inbreeding of individuals from such stocks can give rise to lines showing the whole range from almost zero to almost complete penetrance, representing the effects of the ‘antennaless’ gene when combined with different gene backgrounds4. The main difference between the two experiments seems to lie in the fact that in the crossveinless experiments the life-history includes a period of highly abnormal conditions, whereas in ‘antennaless’ the cycle is completed under normal culture conditions. The difference is, however, only one of degree, and the two situations would seem to be essentially parallel.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Waddington, Nature, 169, 278 (1952).
Goldschmidt, “Physiological Genetics” (1938).
Gordon and Sang, Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 130 (1941).
Begg and Packman (unpublished results).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BEGG, M. Selection of the Genetic Basis for an Acquired Character. Nature 169, 625 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1038/169625a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/169625a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.