Abstract
IN 1942 I published a short note1 on a tetraploid plant of diœcious Melandrium found growing wild in Svalöv in southern Sweden. The specimen in question was a female individual growing between the fields behind the place where the new laboratories of chemistry and cytology were erected later. Its flowers were red, as in M. diœcum ssp. rubrum2; the leaves were thick, like those of the coastal ecotype of this subspecies. Morphological comparisons seemed to indicate that this plant was identical with the type described as M. crassifolium by Fries3, especially as regards the size of the cells and thickness of the leaves. It was furthermore said that the closer morphological and microscopical analyses of M. crassifolium and M. rubrum ssp. lapponicum Simmons indicated that those types were identical, thus indirectly stating a rather wide coastal and montane distribution of the tetraploid.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Löve, D., Hereditas, 28, 241 (1942).
Löve, D., Bot. Notiser, 125 (1944).
Fries, E., Bot. Notiser, 161 (1857).
Baker, H. G., J. Ecol., 35, 271 (1947).
Löve, D., Sv. Bot. Tidskr., 36, 262 (1942).
Baker, H. G., and Jackson, W., Nature, 168, 747 (1951).
Åkerlund, E., Hereditas, 10, 153 (1927); 18, 16 (1933).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LÖVE, D. Tetraploid Diœcious Melandrium. Nature 169, 591–592 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1038/169591a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/169591a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.