Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Lotmar–Picken X-Ray Diagram of Dried Muscle

Abstract

DURING the past twenty-five years, four samples of dried muscle have been made which show a striking X-ray diagram, with sharp diffraction maxima superimposed on the α-keratin pattern usually obtained from muscle. These samples of muscle were from the frog (sartorius muscle, Herzog and Jancke1), the mussel Mytilus edulis (Lotmar and Picken2; we have been informed by these authors that the muscle used was the anterior byssal retractor, rather than the posterior adductor, as stated in their paper), the scallop Pecten (adductor muscle, Bear and Cannan3), and the squid Loligo (funnel retractor muscle, Bear and Cannan3). Lotmar and Picken proposed a mono-clinic unit of structure, with a0= 11.70 A., b0= 5.65 A., c0= 9.85 A., β = 73.5°, and they suggested that the crystalline substance, assumed to be protein, contains nearly extended polypeptide chains, parallel to the β-axis (the fibre axis), with two of these chains (four amino-acid residues) per unit cell. We have also discussed the X-ray pattern, on the assumption that the crystalline substance is a protein, and have suggested that the structure of the protein is that of the 3.7-residue helix4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herzog, R. O., and Jancke, W., Naturwiss., 14, 1223 (1926).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lotmar, W., and Picken, L. E. R., Helv. Chim. Acta, 25, 538 (1942).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bear, R. S., and Cannan, C. M. N., Nature, 168, 684 (1951).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pauling, L., and Corey, R. B., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 37, 261 (1951).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bamford, C. H., and Hanby, W. E., Nature, 168, 1085 (1951).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pauling, L., Corey, R. B., and Branson, H. R., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 37, 205 (1951).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pauling, L., and Corey, R. B., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 37, 235 (1951).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bamford, C. H., and Hanby, W. E., Nature, 169, 120 (1952).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PAULING, L., COREY, R. The Lotmar–Picken X-Ray Diagram of Dried Muscle. Nature 169, 494–495 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1038/169494b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/169494b0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing