Abstract
THIS is a disappointing document. The Commission was asked "to consider the practice of human artificial insemination with special reference to its theological, moral, social, psychological and legal implications". But the Archbishop in his preface states that it is not to be taken as a "Church document", though he does not explain what exactly such a document is.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Artificial Human Insemination*. Nature 162, 790–791 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1038/162790a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/162790a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
