Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Meteor Whistles

Abstract

MANY observers have reported Doppler-effect heterodynes in the background of received high-frequency broadcast signals. The accepted explanation of the whistles is that waves received after reflexion from ionized meteor trails have undergone a frequency-shift, relative to the waves received by a more direct path. Usually, the pitch of the heterodyne descends to zero. Chamanlal and Venkataraman1 suggested, in 1941, that the descending pitch was the result of the meteor being rapidly retarded in velocity. More recently, Sir Edward Appleton and Mr. R. Naismith2 proposed an alternative explanation of the change of pitch, which is ascribed to the reduction of the difference between the two path-lengths that occurs as the meteor, travelling tangentially to the observer, approaches the minimum distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chamanlal and Venkataraman, Nature, 149, 416 (1942); summary of article in Electrotechnics (Bangalore, Nov. 1941).

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, Sir Edward, and Naismith, R., Proc. Phys. Soc, 59, 461 (1947).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GRIFFITHS, H., MARTINGELL, S. & BAYLIFF, R. Meteor Whistles. Nature 161, 478–479 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1038/161478a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/161478a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing