Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Osmolality of preterm formulas supplemented with nonprotein energy supplements

Abstract

Background:

Addition of energy supplements to preterm formulas is an optional strategy to increase the energy intake in infants requiring fluid restriction, in conditions like bronchopulmonary dysplasia. This strategy may lead to an undesirable increase in osmolality of feeds, the maximum recommended safe limit being 400 mOsm/kg. The aim of the study was to measure the changes in osmolality of several commercialized preterm formulas after addition of glucose polymers and medium-chain triglycerides.

Methods:

Osmolality was measured by the freezing point depression method. Six powdered formulas with concentrations of 14 g/100 ml and 16 g/100 ml, and five ready-to-feed liquid formulas were analyzed. All formulas, were supplemented with 10% (low supplementation) or 20% (high supplementation) of additional calories, respectively, in the form of glucose polymers and medium chain triglycerides, maintaining a 1:1 glucose:lipid calorie ratio. Inter-analysis and intra-analysis coefficients of variation of the measurements were always < 3.9%.

Results:

The mean osmolality (mOsm/kg) of the non-supplemented formulas varied between 268.5 and 315.3 mOsm/kg, increasing by 3–5% in low supplemented formulas, and by 6–10% in high supplemented formulas. None of the formulas analyzed exceeded 352.8 mOsm/kg.

Conclusion:

The supplementation of preterm formulas with nonprotein energy supplements with up to 20% additional calories did not exceed the maximum recommended osmolality for neonatal feedings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Academy of Pediatrics and Committee on Nutrition (AAP CON) (1976). Commentary on breast-feeding and infant formulas included proposed standard formulas. Pediatrics 57, 278–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson K, Kennedy B (1986). A model for the prediction of osmolalities of modular formulas. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 10, 646–649.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooke OG (1983). Glucose polymers supplements in very low birthweight infants [Letter]. Br Med J 286, 1143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke R, Embleton N, Rigo J, Carrie A, Haschke F, Ziegler E (2006). High protein pre-term infant formula: effect on nutrient balance, metabolic status and growth. Pediatr Res 59, 265–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costalos C, Russell G, Al Rahim Q, Blumenthal I, Hanlin S, Ross I (1980). Gastric emptying of Caloreen meals in the newborn. Arch Dis Child 55, 883–885.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Curtis M, Candusso M, Pieltain C, Rigo J (1999). Effect of fortification on the osmolality of human milk. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 81, F141–F143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton TR, Belik J (2002). Routine handling of milk fed to preterm infants can significantly increase osmolality. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 35, 298–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fewtrell M, Lucas A (2002). Enteral feeding of the preterm infant. Curr Pediatr 12, 98–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huysman WA, de Ridder M, de Bruin NC, van Helmond G, Terpstra N, Van Goudoever JB et al. (2003). Growth and body composition in preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88, F46–F51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap S, Ohira-Kist K, Abildskov K, Towers HM, Sahni R, Ramakrishnan R et al. (2001). Effects of quality of energy intake on growth and metabolic response of enterally fed low-birth-weight infants. Pediatr Res 50, 390–397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein CJ (2002). Nutrient requirements for preterm infant formulas. J Nutr 132 (Suppl 1), 1395–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klenoff-Brumberg HL, Genen LH (2003). High versus low medium chain triglyceride content of formula for promoting short term growth of preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1, CD002777:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzner SI, Garg M, Bautista DB, Bader D, Merritt RJ, Warburton D et al. (1988). Growth failure in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: nutrition and elevated resting metabolic expenditure. Pediatrics 81, 379–384.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor DL, Brennan J (2006). Formulas for preterm and term infants. In: Thureen PJ and Hay WW (eds). Neonatal Nutrition and Metabolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 409–436.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira GR, Baumgart S, Bennett MJ, Stallings VA, Georgieff MK, Hamosh M et al. (1994). Use of high-fat formula for premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: metabolic, pulmonary, and nutritional studies. J Pediatr 124, 605–611.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira-da-Silva L, Virella D, Henriques G, Rebelo M, Serelha M, Videira-Amaral JM (2004). A simple equation to estimate the osmolality of neonatal parenteral nutrition solutions. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 28, 34–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puangco MA, Schanler RJ (2000). Clinical experience in enteral nutrition support for premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Perinatol 20, 87–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raffles A, Schiller G, Erhardt P, Silverman M (1983). Glucose polymer supplementation of feeds for very low birthweight infants. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 286, 935–936.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reimers KJ, Carlson SJ, Lombard KA (1992). Nutritional management of infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Nutr Clin Pract 7, 127–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rigo J, Senterre J (2006). Nutritional needs of premature infants: Current Issues. J Pediatr 149 (5 Suppl), S80–S88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romera G, Figueras J, Rodriguez-Miguelez JM, Ortega J, Jimenez R (2004). Energy intake, metabolic balance and growth in preterm infants fed formulas with different nonprotein energy supplements. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 38, 407–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvia G, De Vizia B, Manguso F, Iula VD, Terrin G, Spadaro R et al. (2001). Effect of intragastric volume and osmolality on mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 96, 1725–1732.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutphen JL, Dillard VL (1989). Dietary caloric density and osmolality influence gastroesophageal reflux in infants. Gastroenterology 97, 601–604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tammela OK, Lanning FP, Koivisto ME (1992). The relationship of fluid restriction during the 1st month of life to the occurrence and severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in low birth weight infants: a 1-year radiological follow-up. Eur J Pediatr 151, 295–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thureen PJ, Hay WW (1993). Conditions requiring special nutritional management. In: Tsang RC, Lucas A, Uauy R (eds). Nutritional Needs of the Preterm Infant Scientific Basis and Practical Guidelines. Baltimore: Waverly Europe Ltd, Williams & Wilkins, 243–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler EE, Fomon SJ (1989). Potential renal solute load of infant formulas. J Nutr 119, 1785–1788.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to Dr Paula Nolasco, pediatrician post-graduated in infant nutrition and metabolism, for offering her expertise in providing technical information.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L Pereira-da-Silva.

Additional information

Contributors: LP-d-S contributed to the study design, osmolality measurements and writing the manuscript, MP-GD for the preparation of formulas and collecting samples, DV to statistical analysis and writing the manuscript, ACM to study design and MS in revising the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pereira-da-Silva, L., Dias, MG., Virella, D. et al. Osmolality of preterm formulas supplemented with nonprotein energy supplements. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 274–278 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602736

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602736

Keywords

Search

Quick links