Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Excess male chronic energy deficiency among adolescents: a cross-sectional study in the context of patrilineal and matrilineal societies in Northeast India

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 59, pages 1007–1014 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the sex differences in chronic energy deficiency (CED) among adolescents in the context of patrilineal and matrilineal societies in Northeast India.

Design:

Cross-sectional, community-based study of the Hmar patrilineal society and the Khasi (War and Khynriam) matrilineal society.

Setting:

Mizoram and Meghalaya in Northeast India.

Subjects:

In total, 1733 adolescent boys and girls aged 9–16 y: Khynriam Khasis (n=1005), War Khasis (n=305) and Hmars (n=423).

Measurements:

Weight, height, and socio-economic characteristics. Body mass index (weight in kg/height in m2) was used for assessing CED relative to the international reference values.

Results:

The overall prevalence of CED was significantly greater in boys than in girls. The sex differences in the prevalence of CED were 5, 10 and 6% points in the Khynriam Khasis, War Khasis and Hmars, respectively. Allowing for age and socio-economic variables, the risks of CED were about 1.82 (95% CI 1.14–2.90), 1.83 (95% CI 1.19–3.33) and 1.78 (95% CI 1.10–3.25) times greater in boys than in girls among the Khynriam Khasis, War Khasis and Hmars, respectively. Using logistic regression analysis, the prevalence of CED was negatively associated with family income across study populations. No significant association was found between CED and religion.

Conclusion:

Patrilineal and matrilineal forms of society were not reflected in the prevalence of CED among adolescents. Subject to further studies of the research problems concerning the nutritional status of adolescents, girls fare better than boys with respect to the prevalence of CED.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold F, Choe MK & Roy TK (1998): Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Popul. Stud. 52, 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold F, Kishor S & Roy TK (2002): Sex-selective abortions in India. Popul. Dev. Rev. 28, 759–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashorn P, Maleta K, Espo M & Kulmala T (2002): Male biased mortality among 1–2 year old children in rural Malawi. Arch. Dis. Child. 87, 386–387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bates I, Fenton C, Gruber J, Lalloo D, Lara AM, Squire SB, Theobald S, Thomson R & Tolhurst R (2004): Vulnerability to malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS infection and disease. Part 1: determinants operating at individual and household level. Lancet Infect. Dis. 4, 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogin B (1999): Patterns of Human Growth 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury KK, Hanifi MA, Rasheed S & Bhuiya A (2000): Gender inequality and severe malnutrition among children in a remote rural area of Bangladesh. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 18, 123–130.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM & Dietz WH (2000): Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. Br. Med. J. 320, 1240–1243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daly M & Wilson M (1983): Sex, Evolution and Behaviour, 2nd Edition. Boston: PWS Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871): The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das Gupta M (1987): Selective discrimination against female children in India. Popul. Dev. Rev. 13, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Hera MG, Ferreros I, del Amo J, de Olalla PG, Hoyos SP, Muga R, del Romero J, Guerrero R, Hernandez-Aguado I & GEMES (2004): Gender differences in progression to AIDS and death from HIV seroconversion in a cohort of injecting drug users from 1986 to 2001. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 58, 944–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Onis M, Dasgupta P, Saha S, Sengupta D & Blössner M (2001): The National Center for Health Statistics reference and the growth of Indian adolescent boys. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 74, 248–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diwan VK & Thorson A (1999): Sex, gender and tuberculosis. Lancet 353, 1000–1001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson T & Moore M (1983): On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behaviour in India. Popul. Dev. Rev. 9, 35–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fikree FF & Pasha O (2004): Role of gender in health disparity: the South Asian context. Br. Med. J. 328, 823–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folstad I & Karter AJ (1992): Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. Am. Naturalist 139, 603–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox R (1967): Kinship and Marriage. Baltimore: Penguine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin MF (1999): Comparisons of weight and height relations in boys from 4 countries. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 70 (Suppl), 157S–162S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garenne M (2003): Sex differences in health indicators among children in African DHS surveys. J. Biosoc. Sci. 35, 601–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurdon PTR (1981): The Khasis Reprinted New Delhi: Cosmos Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesketh T, Ding QJ & Tomkins AM (2002): Disparities in economic development in Eastern China: impact on nutritional status of adolescents. Public Health Nutr. 5, 313–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes CB, Hausler H & Nunn P (1998): A review of sex differences in the epidemiology of tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2, 96–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horlick M (2001): Editorial: body mass index in childhood — measuring a moving target. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86, 4059–4060.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW & Lemeshow S (1989): Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudelson P (1996): Gender differentials in tuberculosis: the role of socioeconomic and cultural factors. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 77, 391–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M, Samms-Vaughan M & Ashley D (2002): Nutritional status of 11–12-year-old Jamaican children: coexistence of under- and overnutrition in early adolescence. Public Health Nutr. 5, 281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jejeebhoy SJ & Sathar ZA (2001): Women's autonomy in India and Pakistan: the influence of region and religion. Popul. Dev. Rev. 27, 687–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khongsdier R (2002): Body mass index and morbidity in adult males of the War Khasi in Northeast India. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 56, 484–489.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khongsdier R (2004): Body mass index and morbidity in relation to body composition: a cross-sectional study of a rural community in Northeast India. Br. J. Nutr. 93, 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khongsdier R & Mukherjee N (2003a): Growth and nutritional status of Khasi boys in Northeast India relating to exogamous marriages and socio-economic classes. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 122, 162–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khongsdier R & Mukherjee N (2003b): Effects of heterosis on growth in height and its segments: a crosssectional study of the Khasi girls in Northeast India. Ann. Hum. Biol. 30, 605–621.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer S (2000): The fragile male. Br. Med. J. 321, 1609–1612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger DJ & Nesse RM (2004): Sexual selection and the male:female mortality ratio. Evolutionary Psychol. 2, 66–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Guo SS, Wei R, Mei Z, Curtin LR, Roche AF & Johnson CL (2000): CDC Growth Charts: United States. Advance Data No. 314. Atlanta, GA: CDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcoux A (2002): Sex differences in undernutrition: a look at survey evidence. Popul. Dev. Rev. 28, 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez AN, Rhee JT, Small PM & Behr MA (2000): Sex differences in the epidemiology of tuberculosis in San Francisco. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 4, 26–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer P (1999): India's falling sex ratios. Popul. Dev. Rev. 25, 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller BD (1997): Social class, gender and intrahousehold food allocations to children in South Asia. Soc. Sci. Med. 44, 1685–1695.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra V, Roy TK & Retherford RD (2004): Sex differences in childhood feeding, health care, and nutritional status in India. Popul. Dev. Rev. 30, 269–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizuno R (2000): The male/female ratio of fetal deaths and births in Japan. Lancet 356, 738–739.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muhuri PK & Preston SH (1991): Effects of family composition on mortality differences by sex among children in Matlab, Bangladesh. Popul. Dev. Rev. 17, 415–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Must A, Dallal GE & Dietz WH (1991a): Reference data for obesity: 85th and 95th percentiles of body mass index (wt/ht2) and triceps skinfold thickness. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 53, 839–846.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Must A, Dallal GE & Dietz WH (1991b): Reference data for obesity: 85th and 95th percentiles of body mass index (wt/ht2) — a correction. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 54, 773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nubé M & van den Boom GJM (2003): Gender and adult undernutrition in developing countries. Ann. Hum. Biol. 30, 520–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakyntein V (1999): Gender preference in Khasi society. In Wonder That is Culture, ed. TB Subba pp 171–182. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Cueto A, Almanza M & Kolsteren PW (2005): Female gender and wealth are associated to overweight among adolescents in La Paz, Bolivia. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 59, 82–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman L & Rao V (2004): The determinants of gender equity in India: examining Dyson and Moore's thesis with new data. Popul. Dev. Rev. 30, 239–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice AL, Sacco L, Hyder A & Black RE (2000): Malnutrition as an underlying cause of childhood deaths associated with infectious diseases in developing countries. WHO Bull. 78, 1207–1221.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salim MAH, Declercq E, Van Deun A & Saki KA (2004): Gender differences in tuberculosis: a prevalence survey done in Bangladesh. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 8, 952–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrimshaw NS, Taylor CE & Gordon JE (1968): Interaction of nutrition and infections. WHO Monograph Series No. 57 Geneva: WHO.

  • Sen A (2003): Missing women — revisited. Br. Med. J. 327, 1297–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh S, Mahalanabis D, Chatterjee S, Kurpad AV & Khaled MA (2003): Lean body mass in preschool aged urban children in India: gender difference. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 57, 389–393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfelt AE & Arnold F (1998): Sex differentials in nutritional status of young children. In Too Young to Die: Genes or Gender? pp 133–153. New York: Population Division, United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr GB & Reina JC (1989): Energy expenditure/basal metabolic rate ratios in normal and marginally undernourished Colombian children 6–16 y of age. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 43, 515–527.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson DK, Verter J, Fanaroff AA, Oh W, Ehrenkranz RA, Shankaran S, Donovan EF, Wright LL, Lemons JA, Tyson JE, Korones SB, Bauer CR, Stoll BJ & Papile L-A (2000): Sex differences in outcomes of very low birthweight infants: the newborn male disadvantage. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 83, F182–F185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson S (1985): Sex differences in environmental sensitivity during growth and development. Yearbook Phys. Anthropol. 28, 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taket A (1986): Accident mortality in children, adolescents and young adults. World Health Stat. Quart. 40, 232–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner JM (1962): Growth at Adolescent, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner JM (1975): Growing up. In Biological Anthropology, ed. SH Katz, pp 275–283. San Francisco: WH Freeman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetens I, Hels O, Khan NI, Thilsted SH & Hassan N (2003): Rice-based diets in rural Bangladesh: how do different age and sex groups adapt to seasonal changes in energy intake? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 78, 406–413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorson A & Diwan VK (2001): Gender inequalities in tuberculosis: aspects of infection, notification rates, and compliance. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 7, 165–169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2005): UNICEF statistics on malnutrition. http://www.childinfo.org/areas/malnutrition, accessed on 2/6/2005.

  • van Mil EGAH, Westerterp KR, Kester ADM & Saris WHM (2001): Energy metabolism in relation to body composition and gender in adolescents. Arch. Dis. Child. 85, 73–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vlassoff C & Bonilla E (1994): Gender-related differences in the impact of tropical diseases on women: what do we know? J. Biosoc. Sci. 26, 37–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron I (1983): Sex differences in human mortality: the role of genetic factors. Soc. Sci. Med. 17, 321–333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Monteiro C & Popkin BM (2002): Trends of obesity and underweight in older children and adolescents in the United States, Brazil, China, and Russia. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 75, 971–977.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner JS & Lourie JA (1981): Practical Human Biology. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1995): Physical Status: the Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry Report of a WHO Expert Committee, Technical Report Series No. 854. Geneva: WHO.

  • Worthman CM (1996): Biosocial determinants of sex ratios: survivorship, selection and socialisation in the early environment. In Long-term Consequences of Early Environment: Growth, Development and the Lifespan Developmental Perspective, eds. CJL Henry & SJ Ulijaszek, pp 44–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Department of Anthropology, North-Eastern Hill University, for providing necessary facilities in carrying out the study. Thanks are also due to anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India

    R Khongsdier & R Varte

  2. Department of Anthropology, Women's College, Shillong, India

    N Mukherjee

Authors
  1. R Khongsdier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R Varte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N Mukherjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Khongsdier.

Additional information

Guarantor: R Khongsdier.

Contributors: RK collected data from War Khasis, designed, analysed and wrote the manuscript. NM collected data from Khynriam Khasis, and RV collected data from Hmars.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khongsdier, R., Varte, R. & Mukherjee, N. Excess male chronic energy deficiency among adolescents: a cross-sectional study in the context of patrilineal and matrilineal societies in Northeast India. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 1007–1014 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602205

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602205

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links