Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Receiver operating characteristic analysis of body mass index to detect increased risk of functional morbidity in Vietnamese rural adults

Abstract

Objective: To assess the performance of low BMI, and define optimal BMI cut-off values in order to detect fever-associated adult morbidity.

Design: A cohort study of adults between 18 and 60 y in rural Vietnam, whose BMI and health status were assessed at baseline, and who were then monitored for illness events for 4 months. Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the performance of low BMI to detect the average number of restricted-days due to illness and to determine optimal cut-off values.

Setting: A rural commune in the Red River Delta, northern Vietnam.

Subjects: The study included 693 men and 739 women aged 18–60-y.

Results: At baseline, 21% of the study participants had a BMI<18.5 kg/m2. As BMI progressively decreased, the percentage of participants experiencing morbidity with fever increased. The areas under the ROC curves for BMI were significantly greater than 0.5 for all levels of monthly average restricted-days of illness (MARDI) with fever, with best performance for >5 days/month. Excluding participants with acute or chronic disease at baseline improved the performance of BMI to detect MARDI with fever of >5 days (area under ROC curve 0.95; 95% CI 0.92, 0.99). With increasing levels of MARDI with fever, BMI cut-offs fell to 17.9 kg/m2 when MARDI with fever was >5 days.

Conclusions: The ROC analysis demonstrates that low BMI performs well as a risk indicator of MARDI with fever of >5 days with an optimal BMI cut-off value of 17.9 kg/m2.

Sponsorship: Wellcome Trust Research Training Fellowship in Population Health.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Begg CB (1991): Advances in statistical methodology for diagnostic medicine in the 1980's. Stat. Med. 10, 1887–1895.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brownie C, Habicht JP & Cogill B (1986): Comparing indicators of health or nutritional status. Am. J. Epidemiol. 124, 1031–1044.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Vasconcellos MT (1994): Body mass index: its relationship with food consumption and socioeconomic variables in Brazil. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 48 (Suppl 3), 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferro-Luzzi A, Sette S, Franklin M & James WP (1992): A simplified approach of assessing adult chronic energy deficiency. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 46, 173–186.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francois PJ (1994) Unpublished data. FAO – UN 1990 Cited in Shetty PS, James WP Body mass index (BMI) — a measure of chronic energy deficiency in adults. FAO Food Nutr. Pap. 1–57.

  • Francois PJ & James WP (1994): An assessment of nutritional factors affecting the BMI of a population. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 48 (Suppl 3), 110–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia M & Kennedy E (1994): Assessing the linkages between low body mass index and morbidity in adults: evidence from four developing countries. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 48 (Suppl 3), 90–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giay T & Khoi HH (1994): Use of body mass index in the assessment of adult nutritional status in Vietnam. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 48 (Suppl 3), 124–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiner M (1996): Two-graph receiver operating characteristic (TG-ROC): update version supports optimisation of cut-off values that minimise overall misclassification costs. J. Immunol. Methods 191, 93–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Habicht JP & Stoltzfus RJ (1997): What do indicators indicate? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 190–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James WP (1994): Introduction: the challenge of adult chronic energy deficiency. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 48 (Suppl 3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • James WP, Ferro-Luzzi A & Waterlow JC (1988): Definition of chronic energy deficiency in adults — Report of a Working Party of the International Dietary Energy Consultative Group. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 42, 969–981.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James WP & Francois PJ (1984): The choice of cut-off point for distinguishing normal body weights from underweight or ‘chronic energy deficiency’ in adults. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 48 (Suppl 3), 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jens B & Greiner M (1999): CMDT (Computational methods for diagnostic tests).

  • Naidu AN & Rao NP (1994): Body mass index: a measure of the nutritional status Indian populations. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 48 (Suppl 3), 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryer JA (1993): Body mass index and work-disabling morbidity: results from a Bangladeshi case study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 47, 653–657.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rice AL, Stoltzfus RJ, de Francisco A & Kjolhede CL (2000): Evaluation of serum retinol, the modified-relative-dose–response ratio, and breast-milk vitamin A as indicators of response to postpartum maternal vitamin A supplementation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 71, 799–806.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shetty PS & James WP (1994): Body mass index (BMI) — a measure of chronic energy deficiency in adults. Rome FAO Food Nutr. Pap. 56, 1–57.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stata Corporation™ (2001): Stata 7.0 College Station TX: Stata Corporation ™.

  • Strickland SS & Ulijaszek SJ (1994): Body mass index and illness in rural Sarawak. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 48 (Suppl 3), 98–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veli K & Allan P (1996): GraphROC for windows version 2.0.

  • World Bank Poverty Net (2003) Technical guidelines for the qquantitative analysis of health equity. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/health/wbact/health_eq.htm.

  • WHO Expert Committee (1995): Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. World Health Organization Technical Report Series 854, 345–374.

  • Zweig MH & Campbell G (1993): Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundament evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin. Chem. 39, 561–577.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Dr Huy Vu D for revising the comorbidity questionnaire and assisting with interviewer training. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the staff of the National Institute of Nutrition, the Bavi Preventive Health Centre, and the Minh Quang People Committee in data collection. Support for this research was provided by the Wellcome Trust through a Research Training Fellowship in Population Health to the National Institute of Nutrition, Hanoi, Vietnam, and the University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Guarantor: Michael J Dibley.

Contributors: DTT designed the study, organized and monitored the collection of data, conducted data analysis and prepared the manuscript; MJD contributed to the design of the study, advised about data collection methods, and contributed to the analysis of data and preparation of the manuscript; CD'E provided advice about the design, especially the sampling strategy, and the analysis of data. No author has any financial or personal relationships with the organization sponsoring this research.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T T Do.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Do, T., Dibley, M. & D'Este, C. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of body mass index to detect increased risk of functional morbidity in Vietnamese rural adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 58, 1594–1603 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602010

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602010

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links