Abstract
Objective: To characterise the appetite control in habitual high fat (HF) and low fat (LF) phenotypes.
Design: Four treatment conditions for each subject group in a fully repeated 2×2×2 measures design.
Setting: The Human Appetite Research Unit at Leeds University, Psychology Department.
Subjects: Eight lean HF (mean % fat intake−46.7% daily energy) and eight lean LF (mean % fat intake−29.9% daily energy) were recruited from the staff/student population of Leeds University.
Interventions: All subjects were provided with either a low (2129 kJ) or high (3801 kJ) energy meal at midday and the capacity for compensation was later measured by nutrient challenge (ad libitum consumption of either high fat or high CHO foods). Satiation and satiety were assessed by changes in energy and nutrient intakes, hunger, fullness and food preferences.
Results: The energy and nutrient manipulations gave rise to different levels in the rated intensity of hunger between HF and LF (P<0.01). HF rated their baseline hunger at a higher level than LF, and the nutrient induced changes in hunger had a much greater amplitude. HF consumed significantly more energy from the high fat meals than from the high CHO meals (P<0.05); this effect was not observed in LF. HF ate more energy and a greater weight of the high fat foods but less energy and smaller weight of the high CHO foods than did the LF. HF rated the high fat and high CHO foods equally satisfying, tasty and filling, whereas LF indicated a preference for high CHO foods (P<0.05).
Conclusions: The appetite control in habitual high and low fat consumers is different. HF ‘passively overconsume’ fat whereas this effect is weak in LF. The HF ate a constant weight of food whereas LF ate a more constant level of energy. HF could not distinguish between high and low fat foods suggesting that they were intrinsically insensitive or ‘taste adapted’ whereas LF were fat sensitive. The clear differences disclosed in response to signals generated by the characteristics of ingested food (weight, energy, nutrient composition, taste) suggest that habitual high and low fat consumers can be regarded as distinct behavioural phenotypes. The different styles of appetite control could arise from: (a) intrinsic physiological differences, or (b) a system which is adapted to deal with a particular type of diet.
Sponsorship: This study was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC).
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooling, J., Blundell, J. Are high-fat and low-fat consumers distinct phenotypes? differences in the subjective and behavioural response to energy and nutrient challenges. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 193–201 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600539
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600539
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Appetite, Satiety, and Food Reward in Obese Individuals: A Behavioral Phenotype Approach
Current Nutrition Reports (2013)
-
High-fat and low-fat phenotypes: habitual eating of high- and low-fat foods not related to taste preference for fat
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2001)
-
How covert are covertly manipulated diets?
International Journal of Obesity (2001)
-
Lean male high- and low-fat phenotypes—different routes for achieving energy balance
International Journal of Obesity (2000)