Abstract
THE discussion on animal production in Section M (Agriculture) of the British Association at Cambridge on August 23 had one excellent result: it demonstrated very clearly indeed the inseparableness of the three main constituents-animal husbandry (the feeding and management of livestock), animal breeding and disease-control. Gone, it would seem, are the days when the animal nutritionist claimed that feeding was more important than breeding ; or the geneticist, that breeding was more important than feeding ; or the animal pathologist, that control of disease was a laboratory problem divorced alike from heredity and husbandry. This is not to say that specialists in each of the three fields have, so far, been wasting their time, for there is plenty of evidence to show that in explaining and improving existing practices they have done very necessary work. The animal geneticist, for example, although he has been unable to direct the emergence of strikingly new and improved types of livestock, has been able to interpret the mechanisms of heredity, to define the prerequisites for successful in-breeding and to examine the significance of mutations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
EDWARDS, J. British Association Discussions: Horizons in Animal Production. Nature 142, 530–532 (1938). https://doi.org/10.1038/142530a0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/142530a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.