Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Article
  • Published:

British Association Discussions: Nuclear Physics

Abstract

THE discussion on nuclear physics arranged to take place in Section A (Mathematical and Physical Sciences) on August 18 was introduced by Prof. Niels Bohr, of Copenhagen, who gave an account of the new ideas in nuclear theory which have developed under his guidance during the last few years. The old nuclear theory attempted to explain the interactions of fast particles with nuclei by considering the behaviour of single particles inside the nucleus rather on the same lines as in the theory of the outer electronic system. This picture gave a satisfactory account of the penetration of charged particles into light nuclei but failed to account for many phenomena, in particular the large probability of capture of slow neutrons by nuclei relative to the probability of elastic scattering. These difficulties have been removed by the realization that owing to the tight packing of particles within the nucleus, there is a great facility of energy exchange between the particles. In consequence, when a particle penetrates a nucleus its energy is rapidly distributed amongst all the particles, resulting in a general increase in 'nuclear temperature'. The nucleus then remains in the excited state until sufficient energy is again concentrated on one particle for 'evaporation' or escape to occur. Alternatively, the state of excitation may decay by emission of radiation, but owing to the high symmetry of charge distribution, dipole radiation is in general unlikely and the decay period consequently long. The 'intermediate nucleus' thus exists for a period long compared with the time which would have been taken for the incident particle to traverse the system unhindered.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

British Association Discussions: Nuclear Physics. Nature 142, 520–522 (1938). https://doi.org/10.1038/142520a0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/142520a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing