Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Progress in Chemotherapy

Abstract

PEOPLE in settled and civilized countries, such as Great Britain, are familiar with the beneficent results of the application of the methods of preventive medicine, but these methods are not easy to apply among primitive populations, and in the tropical parts of the Empire the effects of preventive methods are apt to be much less apparent than those brought about by curative medicine, making use of the products of chemo-therapeutical investigation, in the treatment of endemic plagues such as malaria, sleeping sickness, bilharzia, hookworm disease and kala-azar. It is fitting that the value of such work should be recognized, and the decision of His Majesty's Government to spend £30,000 per annum in promoting chemotherapeutical investigations is a welcome move in the right direction. Although work of this kind has not so far been undertaken in Great Britain on so large a scale as in some Continental countries, the amount done is by no means negligible, as was evident from the partial survey of recent work made in the course of a discussion on "The Influence of Structure on the Action of Parasiticidal Drugs"held under the auspices of the Chemical Society on Thursday December 2, in which both biologists and chemists took part.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Schmidt, Z. angew. Chem., 43, 963 (1930). Gray and Trevan, Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 25, 147 (1931).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, van Dongen and Sanches, Arch. intern. Pharmacodyn., 55, 52 (1937).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Butler, Hostler and Cretcher, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 59, 2354 (1937).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morgan and Walton, Chem. and Ind., 56, 853 (1937).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Domagk, Deut. med. Woch., 61, 250 (1935).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gray, Buttle and Stephenson, Biochem. J., 31, 724 (1937).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Albert and Linnell, J. Chem. Soc., 88, 1614 (1936); also a further paper in the Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Progress in Chemotherapy. Nature 141, 62–63 (1938). https://doi.org/10.1038/141062a0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/141062a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing