Abstract
DR. CALDWELL'S chief criticism is directed against a point which has already been proved1, namely, the ability of this virus to enter the roots of a plant without the aid of any known external agencies. Dr. Caldwell says that the term ” air-borne” implies ” that the virus agent can escape from the tissues of the infected plant into the air under natural conditions”. I fear this is wider than my conception of the term; I only meant that the virus was carried in the air, with the added implication that it was able to reach and infect virus-free plants by this means. It never occurred to me that anyone would suppose that the infected plant was discharging virus particles into the air after the manner of an influenza patient. Indeed, the following sentence from my letter makes my meaning quite clear: ” It is not perhaps surprising that such a minute virus and one capable of withstanding complete desiccation should be present in the air.”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Smith, Kenneth M., Parasitology, 29 (1937).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SMITH, K. An Air-Borne Plant Virus. Nature 139, 761–762 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1038/139761c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/139761c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.