Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Chromosome Behaviour and Phylogeny in the Neuroptera

Abstract

THERE has been disagreement on morphological and palæontological grounds as to the relationship of the groups of true Neuroptera and Megaloptera. In the first place, take the family Sisyridse of the true Neuroptera (or Planipennia). Its members possess aquatic larvæ, and as they have some morphological features in common with Osmylidæ, the larvæ of which are semi-aquatic, Tillyard1 in 1916 put forward the suggestion that it had to be regarded as a comparatively late offshoot of the latter. This view was then adopted by Withycombe2, and recently Killington3 in his admirable monograph of the British Neuroptera maintains the idea that ” these two families are no doubt closely allied, and, indeed, it appears very probable that the Sisyridae have been derived from an Osmyloid ancestor”. On the other hand, Handlirsch4 was not of the opinion that the families were very nearly related, and pointed out that Sisyridae show a remarkable similarity with the then oldest known fossil remnants of true Neuroptera, that is, the Triassic Prohemerobidae, the larvae of which are supposed to have been aquatic also. Recently, Handlirsch5 (and Beier), after having considered the discoveries of true Neuroptera in the Permian by Tillyard6 and Martynov7, also directs attention to the striking resemblance of some of these very old remnants with the living Sisyridae, which group he stil] regards as a primitive and primarily aquatic one. Tillyard8 seems later to have given up his original view and regarded Sisyridae as ” a specialized side branch” not very close to Osmylidae. After much dispute, therefore, morphologists have come to no agreement on the relationships of the two groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tillyard, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, 41, (1916).

  2. Withycombe, Trans. Entom. Soc. London, (1924).

  3. Killington, ” A Monograph of the British Neuroptera”, 1 (1936).

  4. Handlirsch, in Schröder's ” Handbuch der Entomologie”, 3 (1925).

  5. Handlirsch (& Beier ), in Kükenthal's ” Handbuch der Zoologie”, 4 (1936).

  6. Tillyard, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, 51 (1926).

  7. Martynov, Trav. Mus. geol. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 4 (1928).

  8. Tillyard, Amer. J. Sci., (5), 23 (1932).

  9. Naville, and Beaumont, Arch. d'Anat. micr., 29 (1933).

  10. Ito, DobutsugaJcuzasshi, 45 (1933).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KLINGSTEDT, H. Chromosome Behaviour and Phylogeny in the Neuroptera. Nature 139, 468–469 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1038/139468a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/139468a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing