Abstract
MOTT1 has predicted that a polarisation of an electron beam is possible under certain conditions. These conditions are that a fast electron shall be scattered successively by two heavy nuclei through large angles. The intensity of the twice-scattered beam should then depend on its azimuth with respect to the original unscattered beam. Many attempts have been made to detect such an effect, with either negative or inconclusive results; but in none of them have the conditions laid down by Mott all been fulfilled. Chase,2 who finds a small positive result, scattered β-rays through 90° from solid targets. The scattering in a solid target is multiple, that is, consists of a large number of small angle collisions, and Mott's theory is completely inapplicable. The same criticism applies to the work of Langstroth,3 who, moreover, uses too small a velocity (due to an error in Mott's paper) for the polarisation to be detectable. In the recent work of Rupp4 and Rupp and Szilard the arrangement is still further removed from that considered by Mott.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mott, Proc. Roy. Soc., A 124, p. 425; 1929.
Chase, Phys. Rev., 36, p. 1060; 1930.
Langstroth, NATURE, 127, p. 891; 1931.
Rupp, Naturwiss., 19, p. 109; 1931. Rupp and Szilard, ibid., p. 423.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DYMOND, E. Polarisation of a Beam of Electrons by Scattering. Nature 128, 149–150 (1931). https://doi.org/10.1038/128149b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/128149b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.