Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Light and Sight

Abstract

I HAVE read Sir John Parsons' article in NATURE of Jan. 21 and the letters of Mr. Smith and Sir John (NATURE, Feb. 18) with great interest. Perhaps I may be allowed to make a few comments on them. Sir John's supposition was that since the retinal sensation curve reaches its maximum not far from that of the energy curve, and since the two curves are not unlike in shape, there may have been some evolutionary process at work. Mr. Smith's criticism is that only on a wave-length basis would this be the case. If, as is preferable, frequencies be taken, then the shapes of the two curves are quite different.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HARTRIDGE, H. Light and Sight. Nature 121, 617–618 (1928). https://doi.org/10.1038/121617b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/121617b0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing