Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Report
  • Published:

RACK1 regulates Src-mediated Sam68 and p190RhoGAP signaling

Abstract

RACK1 is the founding member of a family of receptors for activated C kinase collectively called RACKs. Upon activation of PKC, RACK1 co-localizes with the Src tyrosine kinase at the plasma membrane and functions as a substrate, binding partner and inhibitor of Src (as measured in vitro), and a growth inhibitor in NIH 3T3 cells. To further analyze the function of RACK1 in Src and PKC signaling, we utilized cell-permeable peptides that modulate the interaction of RACK1 and βIIPKC, thereby affecting βIIPKC translocation and function. We found that the association of βIIPKC and RACK1 is necessary for Src phosphorylation of RACK1. Src activity is required for tyrosine phosphorylation of RACK1, and for RACK1 binding to Src, but not to βIIPKC. Endogenous Src kinase activity, as measured by phosphorylation of Sam68 (a mitotic-specific Src substrate involved in cell cycle regulation and RNA splicing) or p190RhoGAP (a Src substrate and GTPase-activating protein involved in actin reorganization), increases with disruption of the Src-RACK1 complex, and decreases with enhanced complex formation. RACK1 inhibits Src-mediated p190RhoGAP signaling and actin cytoskeleton rearrangement. Thus, RACK1 functions as an endogenous inhibitor of the Src kinase in diverse signaling pathways that regulate distinct cellular functions. Our results demonstrate the potential for using peptide modulators of Src activity as a tool for uncovering the function of Src in cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken A, Baxter H, Dubois T, Clokie S, Mackie S, Mitchell K, Peden A and Zemlickova E . (2002). Biochem. Soc. Trans., 4, 351–360.

  • Blake RA, Broome MA, Liu X, Wu J, Gishizky M, Sun L and Courtneidge SA . (2000). Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 9018–9027.

  • Cartwright CA, Eckhart W, Simon S and Kaplan PL . (1987). Cell, 49, 83–91.

  • Chang BY, Chiang M and Cartwright CA . (2001). J. Biol. Chem., 276, 20346–20356.

  • Chang BY, Conroy KB, Machleder EM and Cartwright CA . (1998). Mol. Cell. Biol., 18, 3245–3256.

  • Chang BY, Harte RA and Cartwright CA . (2002). Oncogene, 21, 7619–7629.

  • Chang J, Gill S, Settleman J and Parsons SJ . (1995). J. Cell Biol., 130, 355–368.

  • Donovan S, Shannon KM and Bollag G . (2002). Biochim. Biohys. Acta, 1602, 23–45.

  • Dorn GW and Mochly-Rosen D . (2002). Annu. Rev. Physiol., 64, 407–429.

  • Fincham VJ, Chudleigh A and Frame MC . (1999) 112, 947–956.

  • Hanke JH, Gardner JP, Dow RL, Changelian PS, Brissette WH, Weringer EJ, Pollock BA and Connelly PA . (1996). J. Biol. Chem., 271, 695–701.

  • Hay JC, Hirling H and Scheller RH . (1996). J. Biol. Chem., 271, 5671–5679.

  • Kmiecik TE and Shalloway D . (1987). Cell, 49, 65–73.

  • Lipsich LA, Lewis AJ and Brugge JS . (1983). J. Virol., 48, 352–360.

  • Lukong KE and Richard S . (2003). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1653, 73–86.

  • Mochly-Rosen D . (1995). Science, 268, 247–251.

  • Newton AC . (1995). J. Biol. Chem., 270, 28495–28498.

  • Piwnica-Worms H, Saunders KB, Roberts TM, Smith AE and Cheng SH . (1987). Cell, 49, 75–82.

  • Reynolds AB, Vila J, Lansing TJ, Potts WM, Weber MJ and Parsons JT . (1987). EMBO J., 6, 2359–2364.

  • Ron D, Chen CH, Caldwell J, Jamineson L, Orr E and Mochly-Rosen D . (1994). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 839–843.

  • Ron D, Luo J and Mochly-Rosen D . (1995). J. Biol. Chem., 270, 24180–24187.

  • Ron D and Mochly-Rosen D . (1995). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 492–496.

  • Roof RW, Dukes BD, Chang JH and Parsons SJ . (2000) 472, 117–121.

  • Roof RW, Haskell MD, Bernard DD, Sherman N, Kinter M and Parsons SJ . (1998). Mol. Cell. Biol., 18, 7052–7063.

  • Schechtman D and Mochly-Rosen D . (2001). Oncogene, 20, 6339–6347.

  • Souroujon MC and Mochly-Rosen D . (1998). Nat. Biotechnol., 16, 919–924.

  • Stebbins EG and Mochly-Rosen D . (2001). J. Biol. Chem., 276, 29644–29650.

  • Thomas SM and Brugge JA . (1997). Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 13, 513–609.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Toufan Parman for critical review of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health to CAC (R01 DK43743) and DM-R (R01 HL52141). LDM was supported, in part, by NIH Digestive Disease Center grant DK65339.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine A Cartwright.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, L., Lee, K., Mochly-Rosen, D. et al. RACK1 regulates Src-mediated Sam68 and p190RhoGAP signaling. Oncogene 23, 5682–5686 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207735

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207735

Keywords

Search

Quick links