Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Induction of multiple double-strand breaks within an hsr by meganucleaseI-SceI expression or fragile site activation leads to formation of double minutes and other chromosomal rearrangements

Abstract

Gene amplification is frequently associated with tumor progression, hence, understanding the underlying mechanisms is important. The study of in vitro model systems indicated that different initial mechanisms accumulate amplified copies within the chromosomes (hsr) or on extra-chromosomal elements (dmin). It has long been suggested that formation of dmin could also occur following hsr breakdown. In order to check this hypothesis, we developed an approach based on the properties of the I-SceI meganuclease, which induces targeted DNA double-strand breaks. A clone containing an I-SceI site, integrated by chance close to an endogenous dhfr gene locus, was used to select for methotrexate resistant mutants. We recovered clones in which the I-SceI site was passively co-amplified with the dhfr gene within the same hsr. We show that I-SceI-induced hsr breakdown leads to the formation of dmin and creates different types of chromosomal rearrangements, including inversions. This demonstrates, for the first time, a direct relationship between double-strand breaks and inversions. Finally, we show that activation of fragile sites by aphidicolin or hypoxia in hsr-containing cells also generates dmin and a variety of chromosomal rearrangements. This may constitute a valuable model to study the consequences of breaks induced in hsr of cancer cells in vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balaban-Mallenbaum G, Grove G, Gilbert FW . 1981 Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2: 339–348

  • Brison O . 1993 Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1155: 25–41

  • Brizel DM, Scully SP, Harrelson JM, Layfield LJ, Bean JM, Prosnitz LR, Dewhirst MW . 1996 Cancer Res. 56: 941–943

  • Carroll SM, DeRose ML, Gaudray P, Moore CM, Needham-Vandevanter DR, Von Hoff DD, Wahl GM . 1988 Mol. Cell. Biol. 8: 1525–1533

  • Coquelle A, Pipiras E, Toledo F, Buttin G, Debatisse M . 1997 Cell 89: 215–225

  • Coquelle A, Toledo F, Stern S, Bieth A, Debatisse M . 1998 Mol. Cell 2: 259–265

  • Dujon B . 1989 Gene 82: 91–114

  • Fang JM, Arlt MF, Burgess AC, Dagenais SL, Beer DG, Glover TW . 2001 Genes Chromosomes Cancer 30: 292–298

  • Gisselsson D, Pettersson L, Hoglund M, Heidenblad M, Gorunova L, Wiegant J, Mertens F, Dal Cin P, Mitelman F, Mandahl N . 2000 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 5357–5362

  • Graeber TG, Osmanian C, Jacks T, Housman DE, Koch CJ, Lowe SW, Giaccia AJ . 1996 Nature 379: 88–91

  • Hellman A, Zlotorynski E, Scherer SW, Cheung J, Vincent JB, Smith DI, Trakhtenbrot L, Kerem B . 2002 Cancer Cell 1: 89–97

  • Jasin M . 2000 Cancer Invest. 18: 78–86

  • Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B . 1996 Nature 379: 19–20

  • Knudson AG . 2000 Annu. Rev. Genet. 34: 1–19

  • Krummel KA, Roberts LR, Kawakami M, Glover TW, Smith DI . 2000 Genomics 69: 37–46

  • Le Beau MM . 1986 Blood 67: 849–858

  • Luk CK, Veinot-Drebot L, Tjan E, Tannock IF . 1990 J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 82: 684–692

  • Ma C, Martin S, Trask B, Hamlin JL . 1993 Genes Dev. 7: 605–620

  • McClintock B . 1942 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 28: 458–463

  • Nowell PC, Rowley JD, Knudson AG . 1998 Nat. Med. 4: 1107–1111

  • Perucca-Lostanlen D, Hecht BK, Courseaux A, Grosgeorge J, Hecht F, Gaudray P . 1997 Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 79: 88–91

  • Pipiras E, Coquelle A, Bieth A, Debatisse M . 1998 EMBO J. 17: 325–333

  • Rice GC, Hoy C, Schimke RT . 1986 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 5978–5982

  • Richards RI . 2001 Trends Genet. 17: 339–345

  • Richardson C, Jasin M . 2000 Nature 405: 697–700

  • Rouet P, Smih F, Jasin M . 1994 Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 8096–8106

  • Ruiz JC, Wahl GM . 1988 Mol. Cell. Biol. 8: 4302–4313

  • Saunders WS, Shuster M, Huang X, Gharaibeh B, Enyenihi AH, Petersen I, Gollin SM . 2000 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 303–308

  • Schwab M . 1999 Semin. Cancer. Biol. 9: 319–325

  • Singer MJ, Mesner LD, Friedman CL, Trask BJ, Hamlin JL . 2000 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 7921–7926

  • Smith DI, Huang H, Wang L . 1998 Int. J. Oncol. 12: 187–196

  • Smith KA, Gorman PA, Stark MB, Groves RP, Stark GR . 1990 Cell 63: 1219–1227

  • Smith KA, Stark MB, Gorman PA, Stark GR . 1992 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 5427–5431

  • Sutherland GR, Baker E, Richards RI . 1998 Trends Genet. 14: 501–506

  • Toledo F, Buttin G, Debatisse M . 1993 Curr. Biol. 3: 255–264

  • Toledo F, LeRoscouet D, Buttin G, Debatisse M . 1992 EMBO J. 11: 2665–2673

  • Trask BJ, Hamlin JL . 1989 Genes Dev. 3: 1913–1925

  • Windle B, Draper BW, Yin Y, O'Gorman S, Wahl GM . 1991 Genes Dev. 5: 160–174

  • Yunis JJ . 1983 Science 221: 227–236

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs M Weiss and G Buttin for careful reading of the manuscript and helpful discussion, B Dujon for providing the I-SceI gene and the protein recognition sequence, J Hamlin for the cosmids of the dhfr locus. This work was supported in part by the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer, the Fondation de France, the Ligue Nationale Française contre le Cancer (Comité de Paris). A Coquelle is supported by a fellowship of the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer and L Rozier is a Fellow of the MENRT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Debatisse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coquelle, A., Rozier, L., Dutrillaux, B. et al. Induction of multiple double-strand breaks within an hsr by meganucleaseI-SceI expression or fragile site activation leads to formation of double minutes and other chromosomal rearrangements. Oncogene 21, 7671–7679 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1205880

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1205880

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links