Abstract
IT is, of course, well known to all zoologists that certain names have been applied to structures in different animals without due regard to the real significance either of the name or of the structure, with the result that bv now these names have lost their definiteness and with it their scientific utility. This is particularly the case of certain terms used to designate parts of the vertebrate alimentary canal, and this letter is to ask for criticism upon the following attempt to clear up at least part of the matter. Excluding many names which still have a sufficiently accurate meaning for all practical purposes (although they vary widely in significance, as some are simply topographical, others presume a similarity of function, while others again imply a true homology), I want to focus attention upon the terms ‘œsophagus,’ ‘stomach,’ ‘small and large intestine,’ and ‘rectum.’
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PURSER, G. Nomenclature of the Vertebrate Gut. Nature 119, 855–856 (1927). https://doi.org/10.1038/119855b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/119855b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.