Abstract
THE observations of Messrs. Carl Zeiss, of Jena, challenge the article, “The Promotion of Our Optical Industries,” published in NATURE of February 10 last on three points:—(1) They deny what the article asserted, that supremacy in the optical glass industry passed over from this country to Germany, on the grounds that England never held supremacy in this industry. (2) They deny that State subsidies were made continuously to the optical glass industry in Germany from the time of the investigations of Schott and Abbe in 1881 down to the declaration of war in 1914; and they state categorically that, apart from a sum of 3000l. contributed by the Prussian Government in 1883, no State subsidy has ever been paid to the Jena glass factory. (3) They dispute the proposition that “if the British optical instrument industry is to be maintained and to develop so as to turn out products equal, at least, to the best production of other nations, it must not be dependent on foreign sources for the supply of optical glass, but must have an adequate home supply equal, again, at least to the best available anywhere.“
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
The Development of Optical Industries. Nature 108, 239–240 (1921). https://doi.org/10.1038/108239a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/108239a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.