Abstract
IN the review of our publication by Dr. J. W. Mellor (NATURE, October 4, p. 88) there is a misunderstanding which we feel should not be allowed to pass in the interest of your readers. Dr. Mellor states that we regard the so-called Han pottery as porcelanous, and as the forerunner of true porcelain. Such a statement has never been made; we always held, and still hold, that Han pottery is nothing but a common stoneware. The pottery newly discovered in Shensi, and forming the subject of our investigation, is a distinct group, which, as maintained repeatedly, was not turned out under the Han, but long afterwards, at the end of the third century A.D. In its form and design it is a direct descendant of Han pottery, but its glaze, as proved by analysis, is porcelanous. For this reason it has been styled “Han porcelanous pottery.”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LAUFER, B., NICHOLS, H. The Beginnings of Porcelain in China. Nature 100, 304–305 (1917). https://doi.org/10.1038/100304d0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/100304d0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.